Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286683›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Impact of daily cyclic enteral nutrition versus standard continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in three intensive care units in France (DC-SCENIC).

Jean-Christophe Callahan, Elsa Parot-Schinkel, Pierre Asfar, Stephan Ehrmann, Patrice Tirot, Christophe Guitton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05627167 (Daytime Cyclic Enteral Nutrition Versus Standard Continuous Enteral Nutrition in the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05627167 nacompletednot on this map

Daytime Cyclic Enteral Nutrition Versus Standard Continuous Enteral Nutrition in the Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier le MansRan2023 to 2025Enrolled318ConditionsEnteral NutritionArmsday time cyclic nutrition, continuous nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Christophe CallahanService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France jccallahan@ch-lemans.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-3982
Elsa Parot-SchinkelBiostatistics and Methodology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Pierre AsfarService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Stephan EhrmannService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
Patrice TirotService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.
Christophe GuittonService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.
Centre Hospitalier du Mans · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent guidelines on clinical nutrition of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) recommend initiating continuous enteral nutrition within 48 hours of ICU admission when feasible. However, discontinuous feeding regimens, alternating feeding and fasting intervals, may have an impact on clinical and patient centred outcomes. The ongoing "Impact of daily cyclic enteral nutrition versus standard continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients" (DC-SCENIC) trial aims to compare standard continuous enteral feeding with daily cyclic enteral feeding over 10 hours to evaluate if implementing a fasting-mimicking diet can decrease organ failure in ventilated patients during the acute phase of ICU management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: DC-SCENIC is a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label trial comparing two parallel groups of patients 18 years of age or older receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and having an indication for enteral nutrition through a gastric tube. Enteral feeding is continuous in the control group and administered over 10 hours daily in the intervention group. Both groups receive isocaloric nutrition with 4 g of protein per 100 mL, and have the same 20 kcal/kg/day caloric target. The primary endpoint is the change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at 7 days compared with the day of inclusion in the study. Secondary outcomes include daily caloric and protein delivery, digestive, respiratory and metabolic tolerance as well as 28-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and ventilator-free days. Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Recruitment started in June 2023 in 3 French ICU's and a sample size of 318 patients is expected by February 2026. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the national ethics review board on 8 November 2022 (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est VI, registration number 2022-A00827-36). Patients are included after informed consent. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05627167.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionAdolescentAdultHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARENUTRITION & DIETETICSProtocols & guidelinesRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID38286683
PMCPMC10826523
OpenAlexW4391330452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.