Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286484›Full record

Trial reportStroke and vascular neurology2024

Tenecteplase thrombolysis for stroke up to 24 hours after onset with perfusion imaging selection: the umbrella phase IIa CHABLIS-T randomised clinical trial.

Xin Cheng, Lan Hong, Leonid Churilov, Longting Lin, Yifeng Ling, Jin Zhang, Jianhong Yang, Yu Geng, Danhong Wu, Xueyuan Liu and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04086147 (Chinese Acute Tissue-based Imaging Selection for Lysis in Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04086147 phase2completednot on this map

Chinese Acute Tissue-based Imaging Selection for Lysis in Stroke: a Prospective, Multicentre, Randomized, Open-label, Rater-blinded, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuashan HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled86ConditionsStrokeArmsLow dose tenecteplase, High dose tenecteplase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Thrombolytic agents, more options, more challenges.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin ChengDepartment of Neurology, National Center for Neurological Disorders, National Clinical Research Centre for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7816-0547
Lan HongDepartment of Neurology, National Center for Neurological Disorders, National Clinical Research Centre for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4002-4627
Leonid ChurilovMelbourne Medical School, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Longting LinUniversity of New South Wales South Western Sydney Clinical School, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Yifeng LingDepartment of Neurology, National Center for Neurological Disorders, National Clinical Research Centre for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Neurology, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jianhong YangDepartment of Neurology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yu GengCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China.
Danhong WuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-6669
Xueyuan LiuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyu ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-1788
Yuwu ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qijin ZhaiDepartment of Neurology, Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Huaian, Huaian, China.
Liandong ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Huaian, Huaian, China.
Yangmei ChenDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ying GuoDepartment of Neurology, Pu'er People's Hospital, Pu'er, China.
Xiaofei YuDepartment of Neurology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fan GongDepartment of Neurology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yi SuiDepartment of Neurology, Shenyang First People's Hospital, Shenyang Medical College Affiliated Brain Hospital, Shenyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2898-7877
Gang LiDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-2124
Lumeng YangDepartment of Neurology, National Center for Neurological Disorders, National Clinical Research Centre for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong-Qiu GuChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-1856
Yilong WangChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-0039
Mark ParsonsUniversity of New South Wales South Western Sydney Clinical School, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Qiang DongDepartment of Neurology, National Center for Neurological Disorders, National Clinical Research Centre for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China qiang_dong163@163.com.
CHABLIS-T collaborators
Fudan University · CNLiverpool Hospital · AUShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNTongji University · CNXuzhou Medical College · CNCapital Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNNingbo First Hospital · CNPuer University · CNShanghai East Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNShenyang Medical College · CNThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe performance of intravenous tenecteplase in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion or severe stenosis in an extended time window remains unknown. We investigated the promise of efficacy and safety of different doses of tenecteplase manufactured in China, in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion beyond 4.5-hour time window.

methodsThe CHinese Acute tissue-Based imaging selection for Lysis In Stroke-Tenecteplase was an investigator-initiated, umbrella phase IIa, open-label, blinded-endpoint, Simon's two-stage randomised clinical trial in 13 centres across mainland China. Participants who had salvageable brain tissue on automated perfusion imaging and presented within 4.5-24 hours from time of last seen well were randomised to receive 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or 0.32 mg/kg tenecteplase, both with a bolus infusion over 5-10 s. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with promise of efficacy and safety defined as reaching major reperfusion without symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at 24-48 hours after thrombolysis. Assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. All participants who received tenecteplase were included in the analysis.

resultsA total of 86 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke identified with anterior large/medium vessel occlusion or severe stenosis were included in this study from November 2019 to December 2021. All of the 86 patients enrolled either received 0.25 mg/kg (n=43) or 0.32 mg/kg (n=43) tenecteplase, and were available for primary outcome analysis. Fourteen out of 43 patients in the 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase group and 10 out of 43 patients in the 0.32 mg/kg tenecteplase group reached the primary outcome, providing promise of efficacy and safety for both doses based on Simon's two-stage design. DISCUSSION: Among patients with anterior large/medium vessel occlusion and significant penumbral mismatch presented within 4.5-24 hours from time of last seen well, tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and 0.32 mg/kg both provided sufficient promise of efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04086147, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04086147).

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsIschemic StrokePerfusion ImagingTenecteplaseThrombolytic TherapyTime-to-TreatmentAgedCerebrovascular CirculationChinaFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsFibrinolytic AgentsTenecteplaseClinical TrialStrokeThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID38286484
PMCPMC11732838
OpenAlexW4391324258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.