Trial reportStroke and vascular neurology2024
Tenecteplase thrombolysis for stroke up to 24 hours after onset with perfusion imaging selection: the umbrella phase IIa CHABLIS-T randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04086147 (Chinese Acute Tissue-based Imaging Selection for Lysis in Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Chinese Acute Tissue-based Imaging Selection for Lysis in Stroke: a Prospective, Multicentre, Randomized, Open-label, Rater-blinded, Randomized Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in extended time window: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Time Delay on Reperfusion After Tenecteplase in an Extended Time Window: Analysis From the CHABLIS-T Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Comparative efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous thrombolytics in acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-assessed network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Thrombolytic agents, more options, more challenges.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Article
- Tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a new era in thrombolysis.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- Updates in Intravenous Thrombolysis Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Asian Populations.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Regional perfusion parameters as potential indicators of parenchymal hematoma risk following reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- CHinese Acute Tissue-Based Imaging Selection for Lysis In Stroke Tenecteplase II (CHABLIS-T II): rationale and design.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Review of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Advances in intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in the ultra-time window.Frontiers in neurologyReview
- A narrative review of reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke: Emerging advances, current challenges, and future directions.Brain circulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe performance of intravenous tenecteplase in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion or severe stenosis in an extended time window remains unknown. We investigated the promise of efficacy and safety of different doses of tenecteplase manufactured in China, in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with large/medium vessel occlusion beyond 4.5-hour time window.
methodsThe CHinese Acute tissue-Based imaging selection for Lysis In Stroke-Tenecteplase was an investigator-initiated, umbrella phase IIa, open-label, blinded-endpoint, Simon's two-stage randomised clinical trial in 13 centres across mainland China. Participants who had salvageable brain tissue on automated perfusion imaging and presented within 4.5-24 hours from time of last seen well were randomised to receive 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or 0.32 mg/kg tenecteplase, both with a bolus infusion over 5-10 s. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with promise of efficacy and safety defined as reaching major reperfusion without symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at 24-48 hours after thrombolysis. Assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. All participants who received tenecteplase were included in the analysis.
resultsA total of 86 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke identified with anterior large/medium vessel occlusion or severe stenosis were included in this study from November 2019 to December 2021. All of the 86 patients enrolled either received 0.25 mg/kg (n=43) or 0.32 mg/kg (n=43) tenecteplase, and were available for primary outcome analysis. Fourteen out of 43 patients in the 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase group and 10 out of 43 patients in the 0.32 mg/kg tenecteplase group reached the primary outcome, providing promise of efficacy and safety for both doses based on Simon's two-stage design. DISCUSSION: Among patients with anterior large/medium vessel occlusion and significant penumbral mismatch presented within 4.5-24 hours from time of last seen well, tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and 0.32 mg/kg both provided sufficient promise of efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04086147, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04086147).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.