ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2024
Reteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 hours (RAISE): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial.
Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05295173 (A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Blind Endpoint and Positive Drug Control Study of Recombinant Human Tissue Plasminogen Kinase Derivatives for Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Blind Endpoint and Positive Drug Control Study of Recombinant Human Tissue Plasminogen Kinase Derivatives for Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Time to Treatment With Reteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The RAISE Trial Subgroup.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Intraocular hemorrhage in patients misdiagnosed with central retinal artery occlusion treated with thrombolysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeReteplase is the third generation of alternative thrombolytic agent. We hypothesis that reteplase will be non-inferior to alteplase in achieving excellent functional outcome at 90 days among eligible patients with acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS AND
designReteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 hours (RAISE) trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE), controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial. A total of 1412 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either reteplase at a dose of 18 mg+ 18 mg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg at a ratio of 1:1. An independent data monitoring committee will review the trail's progress and safety data. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome of this study is proportion of individuals attaining an excellent functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 at 90 days. The secondary efficacy outcomes encompass favourable functional outcome defined as mRS 0-2, major neurological improvement on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ordinal distribution of mRS and Barthel Index score of at least 95 points at 90 days. The primary safety outcomes are symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at 36 hours within 90 days. DISCUSSION: The RAISE trial will provide crucial insights into the selection of thrombolytic agents for stroke thrombolysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05295173.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.