ArticleAlcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)2024
Engagement for alcohol escalates in the 5-choice serial reaction time task after intermittent access.
Article in Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex and Genetic Differences in Behavioral Engagement of Crossed High Alcohol-Preferring and Low Alcohol-Preferring Mice.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive intake plays a significant role in the development of alcohol use disorder and impacts 15 million Americans annually, with approximately 88 000 dying from alcohol related deaths. Several facets we contribute to alcohol use disorder include impulsivity, motivation, and attention. Previous studies have used the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-Choice) to analyze these types of behaviors using sugar, but recently we have published using 10% alcohol as the reward. This study analyzed 48 mice that were trained to respond for alcohol in the 5-Choice. All mice distributed and analyzed first by alcohol preference and then by consumption. Here, we became interested in a new classification called "engagement". High-engaged and low-engaged mice were determined by the number of correct responses during final Late-Stage training sessions. Interestingly, during Early-Stage training, the mice began to separate themselves into two groups based on their interaction with the task. Throughout both training stages, high-engaged mice displayed a greater number of trials and correct responses, as well as a lower percentage of omissions compared to low-engaged mice. Following three weeks of intermittent access homecage drinking, low-engaged mice showed greater increase in perseverative responding relative to high-engaged. Additionally, low-engaged mice decreased their reward and correct latencies compared to high-engaged mice suggesting an increase in motivation for alcohol. Overall, engagement analysis presents two clearly different groups, with only one being motivated to work for alcohol. These two distinct phenotypes in the 5-Choice could be used to model alcohol motivated behavior, which could help us further understand alcohol use disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.