Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285938›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Reassessing the role of urban green space in air pollution control.

Zander S Venter, Amirhossein Hassani, Erik Stange, Philipp Schneider, Núria Castell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Urban greenspace and dementia: Measures, mechanisms, and methodological guidance.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Climate Change and Air Pollution-Related Health Effects on Pain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zander S VenterNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Oslo 0855, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-7162
Amirhossein HassaniThe Climate and Environmental Research Institute NILU, Kjeller 2027, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-0490
Erik StangeNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Oslo 0855, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-7972
Philipp SchneiderThe Climate and Environmental Research Institute NILU, Kjeller 2027, Norway.
Núria CastellThe Climate and Environmental Research Institute NILU, Kjeller 2027, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2312-8168

Funding

Norges Forskningsr&åd (Forskningsr&ådet) 326641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assumption that vegetation improves air quality is prevalent in scientific, popular, and political discourse. However, experimental and modeling studies show the effect of green space on air pollutant concentrations in urban settings is highly variable and context specific. We revisited the link between vegetation and air quality using satellite-derived changes of urban green space and air pollutant concentrations from 2,615 established monitoring stations over Europe and the United States. Between 2010 and 2019, stations recorded declines in ambient NO

Indexed as

ecosystem servicegreen infrastructurepublic healthurban planningvegetation

Identifiers

PMID38285938
PMCPMC10861851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.