ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Using KMeans Clustering to Evaluate and Alert for Deviations of Linac Photon Beam Parameters.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the daily measured Dosimetric Quality Assurance (QA) parameters of linear accelerator (linac) using Unsupervised Machine Learning (ML) Algorithm thereby evaluating the current machine status and to highlight the probable cause of the 'out-of-range' measured parameter.
methodsFive Parameters measured using PTW QuickCheckwebline device in a linac is subjected to KMeans clustering technique. The measured parameters comprise of Central Axis Dose (CAX), Beam Flatness, SymmetryLR, SymmetryGT and Beam Quality (BQF). Data from Varian with 55- and 107-day's measurements and from Elekta with 75 days measurements from 2 beam matched linacs were used in this clustering technique.
resultsThis evaluation is used to review the current linac status and obtain 1) Upper and lower limits of each parameter (CAX, Flatness, Symmetry, Beam Quality), 2) Frequency of the days when the linac parameters are closer to the target value and when they deviate from the target value. 3) The date when these parameters deviate from the estimated limits. 4) The probable reason for the deviation and 5) Finally if the machine requires maintenance. This methodology ensures that the machine is always closest to the target value, thus providing quality radiation treatment for the cancer patients. Moreover, the performance of the linac is studied meticulously and the need for maintenance is alerted before the linac beam shows marked deviation from the base value.
conclusionKMeans clustering is a very simple and easy to use ML tool. With quick computation time and with lesser data it can arrive at the actual limits of the linac parameters and help to determine if the linac needs maintenance well in advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.