Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285714›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Prediction models of COVID-19 fatality in nine Peruvian provinces: A secondary analysis of the national epidemiological surveillance system.

Wendy Nieto-Gutierrez, Jaid Campos-Chambergo, Enrique Gonzalez-Ayala, Oswaldo Oyola-Garcia, Alberti Alejandro-Mora, Eliana Luis-Aguirre, Roly Pasquel-Santillan, Juan Leiva-Aguirre, Cesar Ugarte-Gil, Steev Loyola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wendy Nieto-GutierrezFacultad de Salud Pública, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-1520
Jaid Campos-ChambergoDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7176-0682
Enrique Gonzalez-AyalaDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.
Oswaldo Oyola-GarciaDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.
Alberti Alejandro-MoraDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.
Eliana Luis-AguirreDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2114-5740
Roly Pasquel-SantillanDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.
Juan Leiva-AguirreDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.
Cesar Ugarte-GilFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Steev LoyolaDirección de Epidemiología e Investigación, Dirección Regional de Salud Lima Provincias, Lima, Perú.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5455-2423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are initiatives to promote the creation of predictive COVID-19 fatality models to assist decision-makers. The study aimed to develop prediction models for COVID-19 fatality using population data recorded in the national epidemiological surveillance system of Peru. A retrospective cohort study was conducted (March to September of 2020). The study population consisted of confirmed COVID-19 cases reported in the surveillance system of nine provinces of Lima, Peru. A random sample of 80% of the study population was selected, and four prediction models were constructed using four different strategies to select variables: 1) previously analyzed variables in machine learning models; 2) based on the LASSO method; 3) based on significance; and 4) based on a post-hoc approach with variables consistently included in the three previous strategies. The internal validation was performed with the remaining 20% of the population. Four prediction models were successfully created and validate using data from 22,098 cases. All models performed adequately and similarly; however, we selected models derived from strategy 1 (AUC 0.89, CI95% 0.87-0.91) and strategy 4 (AUC 0.88, CI95% 0.86-0.90). The performance of both models was robust in validation and sensitivity analyses. This study offers insights into estimating COVID-19 fatality within the Peruvian population. Our findings contribute to the advancement of prediction models for COVID-19 fatality and may aid in identifying individuals at increased risk, enabling targeted interventions to mitigate the disease. Future studies should confirm the performance and validate the usefulness of the models described here under real-world conditions and settings.

Identifiers

PMID38285714
PMCPMC10824411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.