Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Clinical trials of R-(-)-gossypol (AT-101) in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: NABTT 0602 and NABTT 0702.

John B Fiveash, Xiaobu Ye, David M Peerboom, Tom Mikkelsen, Sajeel Chowdhary, Myrna Rosenfeld, Glenn J Lesser, Joy Fisher, Serena Desideri, Stuart Grossman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Cancer: Regulation, Function, and Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

John B FiveashDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-2884
Xiaobu YeDepartments of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
David M PeerboomCleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Tom MikkelsenHenry Ford Hospital Hermelin Brain Center, Michigan, Indiana, United States of America.
Sajeel ChowdharyBaptist Health, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America.
Myrna RosenfeldUniversity of Pennsylvania Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Glenn J LesserDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joy FisherDepartments of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Serena DesideriDepartments of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Stuart GrossmanDepartments of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Lance LeopoldIncyte, Wilmington, Delaware, United States of America.
Louis B NaborsDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USBaptist Health South Florida · USCleveland Clinic · USHenry Ford Hospital · USIncyte (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)UM1CA137443 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSMAN, STUART A · 2014 to 2020
$9.7M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA137443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAT-101 is an oral bcl-2 family protein inhibitor (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, Bcl-W) and potent inducer of proapoptotic proteins. A prior study of the parent compound, racemic gossypol, demonstrated objective and durable responses in patients with malignant glioma. AT-101 has demonstrated synergy with radiation in animal models. The objectives of trial NABTT 0602 were to determine the MTD of AT-101 concurrent with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) (Arm I) and to determine the MTD of AT-101 when given with adjuvant TMZ after completion of standard chemoradiation (Arm 2). Separately in trial NABTT 0702, the survival and response rates of single agent AT-101 were evaluated in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

methodsIn NABTT 0602 Phase I, a 3+3 design was used to define MTDs after maximal safe resection, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received standard concurrent RT (60 Gy) and TMZ 75 mg/m2/day followed by adjuvant TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5 in 28-day cycles (Stupp regimen). In Arm I, AT-101 was administered M-F during the six weeks of RT beginning 20 mg qd. In Arm 2, concurrent with each adjuvant cycle of TMZ, AT-101 was administered at a starting dose of 20 mg, days 1-21 followed by 7-day break for a maximum of 6 cycles. The PK blood samples were collected in the first three patients in each cohort of arm 1. In NABTT 0702 patients with recurrent glioblastoma received 20 mg p.o. per day for 21 of 28 days in repeated cycles to assess overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of sixteen patients were enrolled on the two study arms of NABTT 0602. In Arm 1 AT-101 was escalated from 20 to 30 mg where one of six patients experienced DLT (grade 3 GI ulcer). On Arm 2 one patient treated at 20 mg experienced DLT (grade 3 ileus, nausea and diarrhea). The cohort was expanded to include seven patients without observation of DLT. PK results were consistent with drug levels from non-CNS studies. At study closure six patients are still alive. The median survival times for Arm I and Arm II are 15.2 months and 18.2 months, respectively. In NABTT 0702 fifty-six patients were enrolled and forty-three were eligible for imaging response. Sixteen patients (29%) had stable disease as best response and one partial response was observed. The median OS with single agent AT-101 was 5.7 months (95%CI: 3.8-7.6 months) for patients with rGBM.

conclusionsAT-101 can be safely administered with radiation therapy and TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without toxicity unique to patients with CNS tumors. Because of toxicity observed in non-CNS AT-101 clinical trials, further dose-escalation was not attempted. The recommended dose for future studies that utilize continual AT-101 exposure is 20 mg days M-F concurrent with RT/TMZ and 20 mg days 1-21 for each 28-day cycle of TMZ. AT-101 has limited activity as a single agent in unselected patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Future trials should attempt to better understand resistance mechanisms and consider combination therapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGossypolAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2TemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineGossypolgossypol acetic acidProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Temozolomide

Identifiers

PMID38285688
PMCPMC10824421
OpenAlexW4391324607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.