Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285679›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2024

Glioblastoma and radiotherapy: A multicenter AI study for Survival Predictions from MRI (GRASP study).

Alysha Chelliah, David A Wood, Liane S Canas, Haris Shuaib, Stuart Currie, Kavi Fatania, Russell Frood, Chris Rowland-Hill, Stefanie Thust, Stephen J Wastling and 30 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biological tumor volume predicts survival in recurrent High-Grade glioma: A multiparametric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Alysha ChelliahSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-1565
David A WoodSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Liane S CanasSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2553-1284
Haris ShuaibGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6975-5960
Stuart CurrieLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0154-6588
Kavi FataniaLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Russell FroodLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-9922
Chris Rowland-HillHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, England, UK.
Stefanie ThustUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-6000
Stephen J WastlingUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-9932
Sean TenantThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester, UK.
Catherine McBainThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester, UK.
Karen FowerakerNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Matthew WilliamsRadiotherapy Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Qiquan WangRadiotherapy Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Andrei RomanGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Carmen DragosBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Amersham, UK.
Mark MacDonaldGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Yue Hui LauKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0558-4095
Christian A LinaresGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-8873
Ahmed BassiounySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-7234
Aysha LuisSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Thomas YoungGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Juliet BrockBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, England, UK.
Edward ChandyBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-8692
Erica BeaumontLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK.
Tai-Chung LamLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK.
Liam WelshThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joanne LewisNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-4420
Ryan MathewLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2609-9876
Eric KerfootSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7255-6417
Richard BrownSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-9200
Daniel BeasleySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jennifer GlendenningMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK.
Lucy BrazilGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Angela SwampillaiGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Keyoumars AshkanInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sébastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-5340
Marc ModatSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5277-8530
Thomas C BoothSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Brain Tumour CharityCancer Research UK 28832Cancer Research UK RCCCTF-OCT22/100002CandlelightersEPSRC EP/T022205/1Innovation and Technology Commission PRP/067/20FxKing's College LondonLeeds Hospitals CharityMacmillan Cancer CareMedical Research Council MR/N013700/1Medical Research Council MR/W021684/1National Institute for HealthNational Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research CentreNovocureWellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering 203148/Z/16/ZWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203914/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 215010/Z/18/ZYorkshire's Brain Tumour Charity
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to predict survival of glioblastoma at 8 months after radiotherapy (a period allowing for completing a typical course of adjuvant temozolomide), by applying deep learning to the first brain MRI after radiotherapy completion.

methodsRetrospective and prospective data were collected from 206 consecutive glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase -wildtype patients diagnosed between March 2014 and February 2022 across 11 UK centers. Models were trained on 158 retrospective patients from 3 centers. Holdout test sets were retrospective (n = 19; internal validation), and prospective (n = 29; external validation from 8 distinct centers). Neural network branches for T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted inputs were concatenated to predict survival. A nonimaging branch (demographics/MGMT/treatment data) was also combined with the imaging model. We investigated the influence of individual MR sequences; nonimaging features; and weighted dense blocks pretrained for abnormality detection.

resultsThe imaging model outperformed the nonimaging model in all test sets (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, AUC P = .038) and performed similarly to a combined imaging/nonimaging model (P > .05). Imaging, nonimaging, and combined models applied to amalgamated test sets gave AUCs of 0.93, 0.79, and 0.91. Initializing the imaging model with pretrained weights from 10 000s of brain MRIs improved performance considerably (amalgamated test sets without pretraining 0.64; P = .003).

conclusionsA deep learning model using MRI images after radiotherapy reliably and accurately determined survival of glioblastoma. The model serves as a prognostic biomarker identifying patients who will not survive beyond a typical course of adjuvant temozolomide, thereby stratifying patients into those who might require early second-line or clinical trial treatment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTemozolomideTemozolomideartificial intelligencedeep learningglioblastomamagnetic resonance imagingsurvival

Identifiers

PMID38285679
PMCPMC11145448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.