Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285462›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Deep Learning Identifies High-Quality Fundus Photographs and Increases Accuracy in Automated Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Detection.

Benton Chuter, Justin Huynh, Christopher Bowd, Evan Walker, Jasmin Rezapour, Nicole Brye, Akram Belghith, Massimo A Fazio, Christopher A Girkin, Gustavo De Moraes and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benton ChuterHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Justin HuynhHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Christopher BowdHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Evan WalkerHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Jasmin RezapourHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Nicole BryeHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Akram BelghithHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Massimo A FazioSchool of Medicine, Callahan Eye Hospital, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Christopher A GirkinSchool of Medicine, Callahan Eye Hospital, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Gustavo De MoraesBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
Jeffrey M LiebmannBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
Robert N WeinrebHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Linda M ZangwillHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Mark ChristopherHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Fleet Science Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · US

Funding

Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Radha Ayyagari · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma:Structural AssessmentR01EY011008 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 1995 to 2015
$8.7M
xADAGES III: Contribution of genotype to glaucoma phenotype in African AmericansR01EY023704 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ROTTER, JEROME I, WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2013 to 2017
$6.3M
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyR01EY029058 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Functional ImpairmentR01EY021818 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2011 to 2015
$3.4M
Multimodal Artificial Intelligence to Predict Glaucomatous Progression and Surgical InterventionR01EY034146 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHRISTOPHER, MARK · 2022 to 2025
$1.8M
Predicting and Detecting Glaucomatous Progression Using Pattern RecognitionR01EY022039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOWD, CHRISTOPHER · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
Translational Vision Research Training at UCSDT32EY026590 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2016 to 2025
$854k
Deep Learning Approaches to Detect Glaucoma and Predict Progression from Spectral Domain Optical Coherence TomographyR00EY030942 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTOPHER, MARK · 2023 to 2025
$747k
Machine Learning Methods for Detecting Disease-related Functional and Structural Change in GlaucomaR21EY027945 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOWD, CHRISTOPHER · 2017 to 2018
$426k
AI-Based Identification of Rapid Glaucoma Progression to Guide Clinical Management and Accelerate Clinical TrialsR41EY034424 · NEI · AISIGHT HEALTH, INC. · PI TAFRESHI, ALI, ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2022 to 2022
$240k
Deep Learning Approaches to Detect Glaucoma and Predict Progression from Spectral Domain Optical Coherence TomographyK99EY030942 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTOPHER, MARK · 2020 to 2021
$235k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY030942NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R00 EY030942NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011008NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021818NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022039NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023704NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029058NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034146NEI NIH HHS R21 EY027945NEI NIH HHS R41 EY034424NEI NIH HHS T32 EY026590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) model to assess fundus photograph quality, and quantitatively measure its impact on automated POAG detection in independent study populations. Methods: Image quality ground truth was determined by manual review of 2815 fundus photographs of healthy and POAG eyes from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (DIGS/ADAGES), as well as 11,350 from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Human experts assessed a photograph as high quality if of sufficient quality to determine POAG status and poor quality if not. A DL quality model was trained on photographs from DIGS/ADAGES and tested on OHTS. The effect of DL quality assessment on DL POAG detection was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Results: The DL quality model yielded an AUROC of 0.97 for differentiating between high- and low-quality photographs; qualitative human review affirmed high model performance. Diagnostic accuracy of the DL POAG model was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in good (AUROC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92) compared with poor quality photographs (AUROC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). Conclusions: The DL quality model was able to accurately assess fundus photograph quality. Using automated quality assessment to filter out low-quality photographs increased the accuracy of a DL POAG detection model. Translational Relevance: Incorporating DL quality assessment into automated review of fundus photographs can help to decrease the burden of manual review and improve accuracy for automated DL POAG detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleOcular HypertensionDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFundus OculiHumans

Identifiers

PMID38285462
PMCPMC10829806
OpenAlexW4391324289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.