ArticleClinical rheumatology2024
Fatty infiltration in the posterior muscles of the lower extremities as an MRI feature in antimitochondrial antibody-associated myopathy.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIdiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) with antimitochondrial M2 antibody (AMA-M2) has been associated with distinct clinical characteristics. In this study, we explore the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the muscles of the lower extremities in AMA-M2-positive IIM to gain more insight.
methodsMRI of 22 lower extremity muscles was retrospectively evaluated in 14 patients with AMA-M2-positive IIM and 37 age- and sex-matched patients with AMA-M2-negative IIM. Muscles with inflammatory edema and fatty infiltration were assessed according to the Stramare and Mercuri criteria.
resultsPatients with AMA-M2-positive IIM had significantly higher incidence of MRI involvement with fatty infiltration in five lower extremity muscles, namely the adductor magnus (AM) (13/14 VS 14/37, p < 0.001), semimembranosus (SM) (13/14 VS 17/37, p = 0.002), biceps femoris (BF) (12/14 VS 15/37, p = 0.004), soleus (13/14 VS 23/37, p = 0.041), and the medial head of the gastrocnemius (Gastroc M) (13/14 VS 17/37, p = 0.002) than patients with AMA-M2-negative IIM. Furthermore, the severity scores of fatty infiltrations of the above five muscles in AMA-M2-positive IIM were significantly higher than those in patients with AMA-M2-negative IIM (p < 0.001).
conclusionsSevere fatty infiltrations of the AM, SM, BF, soleus, and Gastroc M in the posterior muscles of the lower extremities are dominant MRI features in our patients with AMA-M2-positive IIM. This unique muscle MRI character may be a helpful indicator in clinical practice for patients with AMA-M2-positive IIM. Key Points • Striking involvement and prominent fatty infiltrations of five lower extremity muscles (adductor magnus, semimembranosus, biceps femoris, soleus, and the medial head of the gastrocnemius) are interesting MRI performances. • Severe fatty infiltrations in the posterior muscles of the lower extremities are dominant MRI features in AMA-M2-positive IIM. • This unique muscle MRI character may be very helpful for the diagnosis of the AMA-M2-positive IIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.