Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285339›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Assays to Predict Developmental Toxicity.

Madhura Banerjee, Aritrika Das, Prarthana Chatterjee, Satarupa Banerjee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madhura BanerjeeSchool of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Aritrika DasSchool of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Prarthana ChatterjeeSchool of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Satarupa BanerjeeSchool of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India. satarupa.banerjee@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human beings are continuously exposed to various toxic substances throughout their lives, which affect their reproductive health and eventually the offspring they give birth to. Mainly, these toxins damage the heart and neurological development of the newborn, but most recently, they have begun to affect the musculoskeletal system as well. These toxins are usually present in food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, or even the polluted air that people breathe; as a result, the prevalence of birth defects is steadily rising. For this reason, it becomes a necessity to deploy a new set of assays to test for such toxins in industries to decrease the occurrence of developmental toxicity. These assays are exceedingly expensive when carried out conventionally using animal models or cells from such sources and have a lower predictive value due to the vast variation between animals and humans. To overcome such major problems, human pluripotent stem cells are now frequently used for these assays. These cells are easily available, are quickly generated from somatic cells (induce pluripotent stem cells), can be of human origin without harming people, and eliminate animal harm, which makes them the top choice of scientists for carrying out any in vitro developmental toxicity assays.This chapter, therefore, provides an overview of several steps that can be used to predict a compound's developmental toxicity by utilizing human pluripotent stem cells. Here, the easiest and most effective procedure has been outlined that can screen many compounds simultaneously.

Indexed as

Biological AssayPluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsColony-Forming Units AssayFoodHeartHumansInfant, NewbornDifferentiated cellsDifferentiationHuman induced pluripotent stem cellsHuman pluripotent stem cellsTest compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.