Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285272›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Additive manufacturing of patient specific bolus for radiotherapy: large scale production and quality assurance.

Deepak Basaula, Barry Hay, Mark Wright, Lisa Hall, Alan Easdon, Peter McWiggan, Adam Yeo, Elena Ungureanu, Tomas Kron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deepak BasaulaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Barry HayPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark WrightPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.
Lisa HallPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Therapy, Melbourne, Australia.
Alan EasdonPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter McWigganPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.
Adam YeoPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Elena UngureanuPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Tomas KronPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. Tomas.Kron@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-4046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bolus is commonly used to improve dose distributions in radiotherapy in particular if dose to skin must be optimised such as in breast or head and neck cancer. We are documenting four years of experience with 3D printed bolus at a large cancer centre. In addition to this we review the quality assurance (QA) program developed to support it. More than 2000 boluses were produced between Nov 2018 and Feb 2023 using fused deposition modelling (FDM) printing with polylactic acid (PLA) on up to five Raise 3D printers. Bolus is designed in the radiotherapy treatment planning system (Varian Eclipse), exported to an STL file followed by pre-processing. After checking each bolus with CT scanning initially we now produce standard quality control (QC) wedges every month and whenever a major change in printing processes occurs. A database records every bolus printed and manufacturing details. It takes about 3 days from designing the bolus in the planning system to delivering it to treatment. A 'premium' PLA material (Spidermaker) was found to be best in terms of homogeneity and CT number consistency (80 HU +/- 8HU). Most boluses were produced for photon beams (93.6%) with the rest used for electrons. We process about 120 kg of PLA per year with a typical bolus weighing less than 500 g and the majority of boluses 5 mm thick. Print times are proportional to bolus weight with about 24 h required for 500 g material deposited. 3D printing using FDM produces smooth and reproducible boluses. Quality control is essential but can be streamlined.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalHumansPolyestersQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ControlRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedPolyesterspoly(lactide)3D printingBolusQuality assuranceRadiotherapySurface guidance

Identifiers

PMID38285272
PMCPMC11166743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.