SynthesisZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2024
A meta-analysis of melanoma risk in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients.
Synthesis in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recurrent and new primary cancer risk in adult patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis and a history of malignancy.Clinical and experimental rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is a group of chronic acquired autoimmune diseases. The association between IIM and malignancies has been observed for decades. No meta-analysis has been conducted to summarize the relationship between IIM and melanoma. Herein, we specifically wanted to investigate whether IIM is associated with a higher incidence of melanoma.
methodsWe searched both Chinese and English databases (CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) for studies on IIM related to melanoma published up to October 2023. Two independent authors reviewed all literature to identify studies according to predefined selection criteria. Fixed effects models were applied to pool the risk. Publication bias was also evaluated and sensitivity analysis performed.
resultsA total of 1660 articles were initially identified but only four cohort studies met the criteria. Thus, 4239 IIM patients were followed up. The pooled overall risk ratio/hazard ratio was 3.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-5.37) and the standardized incidence ratio was 6.30 (95% CI 1.59-11.02).
conclusionThe present meta-analysis suggests that IIM patients are at a significantly higher risk of developing melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.