Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38285168›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

The 6:1 short stitch SL-WL-ratio: short term closure results of transverse and midline incisions in elective and emergency operations.

M Golling, V Breul, Z Zielska, P Baumann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01938222 (A Prospective, Controlled Monocentric Study Evaluating the 6), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01938222 completednot on this map

A Prospective, Controlled Monocentric Study Evaluating the 6:1 Suture Technique Using Suture Material Monomax® for Abdominal Wall Closure After Primary Abdominal Incision

TypeobservationalSponsorDiakonie-Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall gGmbHRan2013 to 2017Enrolled351ConditionsDehiscence of Laparotomy Wound, Surgical Wound InfectionArmsShort Stitch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M GollingDiakonieklinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. markus.golling@diakoneo.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-4922
V BreulBBraun, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Z ZielskaDiakonieklinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
P BaumannBBraun, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze laparotomy closure quality (suture/wound length ratio; SL/WL) and short term complications (surgical site occurrence; SSO) of conventional midline and transverse abdominal incisions in elective and emergency laparotomies with a longterm, absorbent, elastic suture material.

methodProspective, monocentric, non-randomized, controlled cohort study on short stitches with a longterm resorbable, elastic suture (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate, [p-4OHB]) aiming at a 6:1 SL/WL-ratio in midline and transverse, primary and secondary laparotomies for elective and emergency surgeries.

resultsWe included 351 patients (♂: 208; ♀: 143) with midline (n = 194), transverse (n = 103), and a combined midline/transverse L-shaped (n = 54) incisions. There was no quality difference in short stitches between elective (n = 296) and emergency (n = 55) operations. Average SL/WL-ratio was significantly higher for midline than transverse incisions (6.62 ± 2.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.51, p < 0.001). Results in the first 150 patients showed a reduced SL/WL-ratio to the following 200 suture closures (SL/WL-ratio: 5.64 ± 2.5 vs 6.1 ± 2.3; p < 0.001). SL/WL-ratio varied insignificantly among the six surgeons participating while results were steadily improving over time. Clinically, superficial surgical site infections (SSI, CDC-A1/2) were encountered in 8%, while 4,3% were related to intraabdominal complications (CDC-A3). An abdominal wall dehiscence (AWD) occurred in 22/351 patients (6,3%)-twice as common in emergency than elective surgery (12,7 vs 5,1%)-necessitating an abdominal revision in 86,3% of cases.

conclusionWe could show that a short stitch 6:1 SL/WL-ratio with a 2-0 single, ultra-long term, absorbent, elastic suture material can be performed in only 43% of cases (85% > 4:1 SL/WL-ratio), significantly better in midline than transverse incisions. Transverse incisions should preferably be closed in two layers to achieve a sufficient SL/WL-ratio equivalent to the median incision. CLINICAL TRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01938222.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAbdominal Wound Closure TechniquesAbdominal MusclesCohort StudiesFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparotomyMaleProspective StudiesSuturesSuture Techniques6:1 suture -/wound length (SL/WL) ratioControlled trialElective and emergency surgeryFascial closure techniqueHuman cohort studyLaparotomyMedian/midline and transverse incisionNon randomizedShort stitchesSmall bites

Identifiers

PMID38285168
PMCPMC10997695
OpenAlexW4391315587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.