Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Katherine J HunzingerDepartment of Exercise Science, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4599-8543
Alexa E WalterDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania-Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kimberly A RosenthalDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
B Gwen WindhamMemory Impairment and Neurodegenerative Dementia (MIND) Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Priya PaltaDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Stephen P JuraschekDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4168-2696
Caitlin W HicksDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-1936
Rebecca F GottesmanNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Andrea L C SchneiderDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania-Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US
Funding
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) Renewal 2023-2028U01HL096812 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI JOSEF CORESH, THOMAS H MOSLEY · 2010 to 2026
$65.7M
THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNITIES (ARIC) STUDY - COORDINATING CENTER - TASK AREA B.2 AND B.375N92022D00001 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COUPER, DAVID · 2022 to 2025
$13.7M
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) Renewal 2 of 5U01HL096917 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI MOSLEY, THOMAS H · 2010 to 2018
$11.9M
Stroke, Cognition and Neuroepidemiology SectionZIANS009435 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI GOTTESMAN, REBECCA F · 2022 to 2025
$8.2M
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) Renewal UNC 4 of 5U01HL096899 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COUPER, DAVID J · 2010 to 2018
$7.5M
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS)U01HL096902 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LUTSEY, PAMELA L. · 2010 to 2018
$7.4M
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) Renewal 4 of 5U01HL096814 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUGHES, TIMOTHY M., WAGENKNECHT, LYNNE E · 2010 to 2018
$6.5M
BRIAN INJURY TRAINING GRANTT32NS043126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Douglas Hamilton Smith · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNITIES (ARIC) STUDY - FIELD CENTER - TASK ORDER 01, TASK AREA A75N92022D00003 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LUTSEY, PAMELA L. · 2022 to 2025
$5.1M
THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNITIES (ARIC) STUDY - FIELD CENTER - TASK ORDER 01, TASK AREA A75N92022D00005 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAGENKNECHT, LYNNE E · 2022 to 2025
$5.0M
THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNITIES (ARIC) STUDY - FIELD CENTER - TASK ORDER 01, TASK AREA A75N92022D00004 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI WINDHAM, BEVERLY GWEN · 2022 to 2025
$4.8M
THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNITIES (ARIC) STUDY - FIELD CENTER - TASK ORDER 01, TASK AREA A75N92022D00002 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CORESH, JOSEF · 2022 to 2025
backgroundOlder adults have the highest rates of head injury and are at the greatest risk for subsequent dysfunction, yet research on subsequent physical decline is limited. We sought to examine cross-sectional and prospective associations of head injury with physical functioning and frailty among older adults.
methodsA total of 5 598 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study participants from Visit 5 (2011-13) underwent assessments of physical functioning (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB], comprised of gait speed, chair stands, and balance) and frailty (defined using established criteria) were followed through Visit 7 (2018-19). Head injury was self-reported or based on ICD-9 codes. Adjusted linear and multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate associations. Prospective models incorporated inverse probability of attrition weights to account for death or attrition.
resultsParticipants were a mean age of 75 years, 58% were women, 22% were Black, and 27% had a prior head injury. Compared to individuals without head injury, individuals with head injury had worse physical functioning (SPPB total score, β-coefficient = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.09) and were more likely to be pre-frail (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.35) or frail (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.80) compared to robust. Prospectively, head injury was associated with a 0.02 m/s greater decline (95% CI: -0.04 to -0.01) in gait speed over a median of 5 years. Among baseline robust individuals (n = 1 847), head injury was associated with increased odds of becoming pre-frail (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.67) or frail (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.51) compared to robust.
conclusionsOlder adults with prior head injury had worse physical functioning and greater frailty at baseline and were more likely to become frail and walk slower over time, compared to individuals without head injury.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Associations Between Prior Head Injury, Physical Functioning, and Frailty in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. · full record | OpenQuestion