ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
Improving enzyme functional annotation by integrating in vitro and in silico approaches: The example of histidinol phosphate phosphatases.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and characterization of alternative homologs of histidinol-phosphate phosphatase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Improving enzyme functional annotation by integrating in vitro and in silico approaches: The example of histidinol phosphate phosphatases.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Targeting imidazole-glycerol phosphate dehydratase in plants: novel approach for structural and functional studies, and inhibitor blueprinting.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in sequencing technologies have led to a rapid growth of public protein sequence databases, whereby the fraction of proteins with experimentally verified function continuously decreases. This problem is currently addressed by automated functional annotations with computational tools, which however lack the accuracy of experimental approaches and are susceptible to error propagation. Here, we present an approach that combines the efficiency of functional annotation by in silico methods with the rigor of enzyme characterization in vitro. First, a thorough experimental analysis of a representative enzyme of a group of homologues is performed which includes a focused alanine scan of the active site to determine a fingerprint of function-determining residues. In a second step, this fingerprint is used in combination with a sequence similarity network to identify putative isofunctional enzymes among the homologues. Using this approach in a proof-of-principle study, homologues of the histidinol phosphate phosphatase (HolPase) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, many of which were annotated as phosphoserine phosphatases, were predicted to be HolPases. This functional annotation of the homologues was verified by in vitro testing of several representatives and an analysis of the occurrence of annotated HolPases in the corresponding phylogenetic groups. Moreover, the application of the same approach to the homologues of the HolPase from the archaeon Nitrosopumilus maritimus, which is not related to the HolPase from P. aeruginosa and was newly discovered in the course of this work, led to the annotation of the putative HolPase from various archaeal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.