Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38284445›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2024

Targeted exome sequencing strategy (NeoEXOME) for Chinese newborns using a pilot study with 3423 neonates.

Ziyang Cao, Xiaoyan He, Dongjuan Wang, Maosheng Gu, Feng Suo, Rong Qiang, Ruixue Zhang, Chengrong Song, Xiaohua Wang, Bo Zhu and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Assessment of the variant prioritization strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Ziyang CaoClinical Research Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyan HeCenter for Clinical Molecular Laboratory Medicine of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dongjuan WangCenter for Clinical Molecular Laboratory Medicine of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Maosheng GuCenter of Medical Genetics, Xuzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Feng SuoCenter of Medical Genetics, Xuzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Rong QiangCenter of Medical Genetics, Northwest Women and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Ruixue ZhangCenter of Medical Genetics, Northwest Women and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Chengrong SongCenter of Medical Genetics, Northwest Women and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xiaohua WangCenter of Medical Genetics, Inner Mongolia Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Bo ZhuCenter of Medical Genetics, Inner Mongolia Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Hohhot, China.
Donghua CaoMedical Genetic Laboratory, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center (Group), Dalian, China.
Haihua YuMedical Genetic Laboratory, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center (Group), Dalian, China.
Yiping QuNewborn Screening Center of Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Guosong ShenMedical Laboratory Center of Huzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Jian WuResearch and Development Department, MyGenostics Inc., Beijing, China.
Pengpeng WangResearch and Development Department, MyGenostics Inc., Beijing, China.
Jinxia WangClinical Research Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School, Shanghai, China.
Hongyang ZhangClinical Research Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School, Shanghai, China.
Zijun YanClinical Research Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School, Shanghai, China.
Guangjun YuClinical Research Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School, Shanghai, China.
Lin ZouClinical Research Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6265-6801
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CNChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNInner Mongolia Maternal and Child Health · CNMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Xuzhou · CNTheranostics (New Zealand) · NZChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNHuzhou Women and Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau cstc2019jscx-msxm0189Natural Science Foundation of China 82070167Natural Science Foundation of China 82270160Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC2020CR1047B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborn screening (NBS) aims to detect congenital anomalies, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) has shown promise in this aspect. However, the NBS strategy for monogenic inherited diseases in China remains insufficient.

methodsWe developed a NeoEXOME panel comprising 601 genes that are relevant to the Chinese population found through extensive research on available databases. An interpretation system to grade the results into positive (high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk genotypes), negative, and carrier according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines was also developed. We validated the panel to evaluate its efficacy by using data from the "1000 Genomes Project" and conducted a pilot multicenter study involving 3423 neonates.

resultsThe NGS positive rate in the 1000 Genomes Project was 7.6% (23/301), whereas the rate was 12.0% in the multicenter study, including 3249 recruited neonates. Notably, in 200 neonates, positive per conventional NBS, 58.5% (69/118) showed results consistent with NGS. In the remaining 3049 neonates showing negative results in conventional NBS, 271 (8.9%) were positive per NGS, and nine of them were clinically diagnosed with diseases in the follow-up.

conclusionWe successfully designed a NeoEXOME panel for targeted sequencing of monogenic inherited diseases in NBS. The panel demonstrated high performance in the Chinese population, particularly for the early detection of diseases with no biochemical markers.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeonatal ScreeningExome SequencingGenotypeHumansInfant, NewbornPilot Projectsmonogenic inherited diseasesNeoEXOME panel performancenewborn screeningpilot studytargeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38284445
PMCPMC10795095
OpenAlexW4390988407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.