ArticleEuropean stroke journal2024
High pillow and spontaneous vertebral artery dissection: A case-control study implicating "Shogun pillow syndrome".
Article in European stroke journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissection in the V1 and V4 Segments Induced by Artery Anomalies and Risk Factors.Cureus · 2025Article
- Traumatic Vertebral Artery Injury: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Key Considerations for Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Routine Neck Massage, a Devastating Stroke: Imaging Clues to Vertebral Artery Dissection.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe underlying causes of spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (sVAD) remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to determine whether high-pillow usage is associated with an increased risk of sVAD and evaluate the frequency of sVAD attributable to high-pillow usage. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis case-control study identified patients with sVAD and age- and sex-matched non-sVAD controls (case-to-control ratio: 1:1) treated at a certified comprehensive stroke center in Japan between 2018 and 2023. The pillow height used at the onset of the index disease was measured and classified into three categories between 12 and 15 cm boundaries. Univariable logistic regression was performed to assess the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of high-pillow usage for sVAD development. A subgroup of sVAD attributable to high-pillow usage was defined with the following three conditions: high-pillow usage (⩾12 or ⩾15 cm); no minor preceding trauma; and wake-up onset.
resultsFifty-three patients with sVAD and 53 non-sVAD controls (42% women, median age: 49 years) were identified. High-pillow usage (⩾12 and ⩾15 cm) was more common in the sVAD group than in the non-sVAD group (34 vs 15%; OR = 2.89; 95%CI = 1.13-7.43 and 17 vs 1.9%; OR = 10.6; 95%CI = 1.30-87.3, respectively). The subgroup of sVAD attributed to high-pillow usage (⩾12 and ⩾15 cm) was found in 11.3% (95%CI = 2.7%-19.8%) and 9.4% (95%CI = 1.5%-17.3%), respectively.
conclusionHigh-pillow usage was associated with an increased risk of sVAD and accounted for approximately 10% of all sVAD cases. This tentative subgroup of sVAD may represent a distinct spectrum of disease-Shogun pillow syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.