ArticleACS omega2024
Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational nanobody design using graph neural networks and Metropolis Monte Carlo sampling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Neuropeptide and cytokines expression in long COVID-19 related neuropsychological sequelae: insights into NK1R-mediated neuroinflammation andFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- In silico prediction method for plant Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat- and pathogen effector interactions.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- The impact of curation errors in the PDBBind Database on machine learning predictions of protein-protein binding affinity.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play a central role in nearly all cellular processes. The strength of the binding in a PPI is characterized by the binding affinity (BA) and is a key factor in controlling protein-protein complex formation and defining the structure-function relationship. Despite advancements in understanding protein-protein binding, much remains unknown about the interfacial region and its association with BA. New models are needed to predict BA with improved accuracy for therapeutic design. Here, we use machine learning approaches to examine how well different types of interfacial contacts can be used to predict experimentally determined BA and to reveal the impact of the specific amino acids at the binding interface on BA. We create a series of multivariate linear regression models incorporating different contact features at both residue and atomic levels and examine how different methods of identifying and characterizing these properties impact the performance of these models. Particularly, we introduce a new and simple approach to predict BA based on the quantities of specific amino acids at the protein-protein interface. We found that the numbers of specific amino acids at the protein-protein interface were correlated with BA. We show that the interfacial numbers of amino acids can be used to produce models with consistently good performance across different data sets, indicating the importance of the identities of interfacial amino acids in underlying BA. When trained on a diverse set of complexes from two benchmark data sets, the best performing BA model was generated with an explicit linear equation involving six amino acids. Tyrosine, in particular, was identified as the key amino acid in controlling BA, as it had the strongest correlation with BA and was consistently identified as the most important amino acid in feature importance studies. Glycine and serine were identified as the next two most important amino acids in predicting BA. The results from this study further our understanding of PPIs and can be used to make improved predictions of BA, giving them implications for drug design and screening in the pharmaceutical industry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.