ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Folic acid supplementation use during the peri-conceptional period among professionals of a hospital in France.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global folate deficiency among adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Folic acid supplementation during preconception period in sub-Saharan African countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Family Planning and Preconception Care Service Management: The Key Role of Bulgarian GPs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Folic acid insufficiency is an important risk factor for congenital neural tube defects. Despite recommendations and national campaigns, the proportion of women taking folic acid in the peri-conceptional period remains insufficient worldwide. We describe in this study the proportion of peri-conceptional folic acid supplementation use and its determinants among a population of hospital workers during the course of a prevention campaign. We performed a single-center cross sectional study in a university hospital in France. Data were collected during 2 months in 2019 by an online questionnaire sent to all professionals. We collected information about folic acid supplementation use, its modalities (form, period, frequency and dosage) and reason for initiating or not supplementation. Response rate was 11.4 % (n = 1,075/9,447). Among the 748 women who reported at least one pregnancy, 72.7 % (95 % CI: 69.4-76.0 %) reported taking folic acid during their last pregnancy. Main reason for initiating supplementation was information given by a health professional (87.8 %), especially by gynaecologists-obstetricians. Principal factors associated with folic acid supplementation use were age between 25 and 35 years, high level of education and recent pregnancy. Folic acid supplementation use is still not systematic before and during pregnancy, even among health professionals. There is a case for mandatory folic acid fortification for the French general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.