ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Quantification of blood flow index in diffuse correlation spectroscopy using a robust deep learning method.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of diffuse correlation spectroscopy analytical models for cerebral blood flow measurements.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Cerebral blood flow monitoring using a deep learning implementation of the two-layer diffuse correlation spectroscopy analytical model with a 512 × 512 SPAD array.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Fast blood flow index reconstruction of diffuse correlation spectroscopy using a back-propagation-free data-driven algorithm.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- A Device-on-Chip Solution for Real-Time Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy Using FPGA.Biosensors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a powerful, noninvasive optical technique for measuring blood flow. Traditionally the blood flow index (BFi) is derived through nonlinear least-square fitting the measured intensity autocorrelation function (ACF). However, the fitting process is computationally intensive, susceptible to measurement noise, and easily influenced by optical properties (absorption coefficient Aim: We aim to develop a data-driven method that enables rapid and robust analysis of multiple-scattered light's temporal ACFs. Moreover, the proposed method can be applied to a range of source-detector distances instead of being limited to a specific source-detector distance. Approach: We present a deep learning architecture with one-dimensional convolution neural networks, called DCS neural network (DCS-NET), for BFi and coherent factor ( Results: DCS-NET shows a much faster analysis speed, around 17,000-fold and 32-fold faster than the traditional three-layer and semi-infinite models, respectively. It offers higher intrinsic sensitivity to deep tissues compared with fitting methods. DCS-NET shows excellent anti-noise features and is less sensitive to variations of Conclusions: DCS-NET can robustly quantify blood flow measurements at considerable source-detector distances, corresponding to much deeper biological tissues. It has excellent potential for hardware implementation, promising continuous real-time blood flow measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.