ArticleCureus2024
Practices and Attitudes of Surgeons With Regard to Spilled Gallstones During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGallbladder perforation and gallstone leakage are frequent complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Failure to remove gallstones may result in several issues that manifest immediately or years later. The goal of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of surgeons and the procedures used by them to deal with gallstone spillage during LC.
methodsA cross-sectional design was followed. Surgeons in nine healthcare facilities in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia were approached through non-probability convivence sampling and the survey was distributed in each of the general surgery divisions. The study included general surgeons who currently performed LC and incomplete responses and interns were excluded. A self-administered questionnaire was developed with 18 questions regarding demographics, center, and designation at the hospital, surgeons' experience of LC, and exposure to gallstone spillage. Furthermore, items regarding knowledge, attitude, and self-reported practices related to gallstone spillage such as incidence, complications, and intervention taken to prevent gallstone spillage were also included. The level of significance was set at P <0.05.
resultsThere were 82 participants of both genders, including consultants, specialists, and residents. While only 23 (28%) participants had actually observed patients with complications from spilled stones, 46 (56.1%) participants were aware of this possibility, 53 (64.6%) deemed it inappropriate to bring up gallstone spillage when securing consent for LC, and 67 (81.7%) believed that such an incident needed to be documented in the operation notes. Only 11 (13.4%) thought that the complications arising out of the unretrieved gallstones should fall under the legal purview of the operative surgeon. There were very few complications of spilled gallstones that the participants were aware of, and none of them anticipated problems to arise more than three years after LC.
conclusionsAwareness of the risks associated with gallstone spillage during LC needs to be raised, and it is imperative to standardize the practices related to their management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.