ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2024
Integrative analysis of RNA expression data unveils distinct cancer types through machine learning techniques.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of next‑generation sequencing‑derived circulating mRNA variants as potential diagnostic tools in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.Oncology reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Explainable AI Model Reveals Informative Mutational Signatures for Cancer-Type Classification.Cancers · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Angiogenesis and Ferroptosis Genes for Predicting the Survival Outcome and Immunotherapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a highly complex and heterogeneous disease. Traditional methods of cancer classification based on histopathology have limitations in guiding personalized prognosis and therapy. Gene expression profiling provides a powerful approach to unraveling molecular intricacies and better-stratifying cancer subtypes. In this study, we performed an integrative analysis of RNA sequencing data from five cancer types - BRCA, KIRC, COAD, LUAD, and PRAD. A machine learning workflow consisting of dataset identification, normalization, feature selection, dimensionality reduction, clustering, and classification was implemented. The k-means algorithm was applied to categorize samples into distinct clusters based solely on gene expression patterns. Five unique clusters emerged from the unsupervised machine learning based analysis, significantly correlating with the known cancer types. BRCA aligned predominantly with one cluster, while COAD spanned three clusters. KIRC was represented within two main clusters. LUAD is associated strongly with a single cluster and PRAD with another cluster. This demonstrates the ability of machine learning approaches to unravel complex signatures within transcriptomic profiles that can delineate cancer subtypes. The proposed study highlights the potential of integrative analytics to derive meaningful biological insights from high-dimensional omics datasets. Molecular subtyping through machine learning clustering enhances our understanding of the intrinsic heterogeneities and pathways dysregulated in different cancers. Overall, this study exemplifies a powerful computational framework to classify gene expressions of patients having different types of cancers and guide personalized therapeutic decisions. Finally, Wide Neural Network demonstrates a significantly higher accuracy, achieving 99.834% on the validation set and an even more impressive 99.995% on the test set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.