ArticleMethodsX2024
Method to evaluate the microbial degradation activity in silage, cow rumen with
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post digestion weed seed survival in cattle.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms are present everywhere and can influence a variety of processes. In agriculture and husbandry, the level of microbial activity can be crucial information, yet the methods for determining microbial activity are usually very long, complex, and costly. In this work, a novel and easy-to-use method, already in use for determining soil microbial activity, named Fertimetro was tested as a fast and cheap solution for measuring microbial activity in silages, in vitro rumen fluids, and manure and slurry. The method was adjusted for the specific conditions of the new testing environments. The results indicate that this method is adequate for measuring cellulolytic microbial activity in vitro rumen fluids, with a coefficient of repeatability (RT%) 92.2 at 24 h and 87.5 at 48 h, and also for cellulolytic microbial activity measures in manure RT% 39.0. While, due to the specific conditions in silages and slurry, this method is less adequate for measuring cellulolytic microbial activity in these environments. This work demonstrates that Fertimetro method can be used in different environments as an easy and cheaper alternative for measuring microbial activity, especially if the interest is only in quantifying the microbial activity and not in knowing the microbial species.1.Fertimetro is an easy-to-use and not costly method to evaluate microbial activity in different environments.2.This method is very adequate for measuring cellulolytic microbial activity in vitro rumen fluids and manure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.