Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283760›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Linking repeated subjective judgments and ConvNets for multimodal assessment of the immediate living environment.

Miroslav Despotovic, David Koch, Simon Thaler, Eric Stumpe, Wolfgang Brunauer, Matthias Zeppelzauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miroslav DespotovicUniversity of Applied Sciences Kufstein Tirol, Kufstein, Tyrol, Austria.
David KochUniversity of Applied Sciences Kufstein Tirol, Kufstein, Tyrol, Austria.
Simon ThalerUniversity of Applied Sciences Kufstein Tirol, Kufstein, Tyrol, Austria.
Eric StumpeUniversity of Applied Sciences Sankt Poelten, Lower Austria, Austria.
Wolfgang BrunauerData Science Service GmbH Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias ZeppelzauerUniversity of Applied Sciences Sankt Poelten, Lower Austria, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of alternative data extraction approaches for multimodal data, can significantly reduce modeling difficulties for the automatic location assessment. We develop a method for assessing the quality of the immediate living environment by incorporating human judgments as ground truth into a neural network for generating new synthetic data and testing the effects in surrogate hedonic models. We expect that the quality of the data will be less biased if the annotation is performed by multiple independent persons applying repeated trials which should reduce the overall error variance and lead to more robust results. Experimental results show that linking repeated subjective judgements and Deep Learning can reliably determine the quality scores and thus expand the range of information for the quality assessment. The presented method is not computationally intensive, can be performed repetitively and can also be easily adapted to machine learning approaches in a broader sense or be transferred to other use cases. Following aspects are essential for the implementation of the method:•Sufficient amount of representative data for human assessment.•Repeated assessment trials by individuals.•Confident derivation of the effect of human judgments on property price as an approbation for further generation of synthetic data.

Indexed as

Affective content analysisAlternative forced choiceAssessment of the quality of the immediate living environmentComputer visionElo ratingHedonic pricingLocation analysis

Identifiers

PMID38283760
PMCPMC10820260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.