Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283750›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health

Comparison of efficacy between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in adenomyosis: a randomized clinical trial.

Satish Choudhury, Saubhagya Kumar Jena, Subarna Mitra, Biswa Mohan Padhy, Sudipta Mohakud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Treatment selection for adenomyosis based on imaging findings and patient characteristics.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Three-dimensional patient-derived endometriosis model for drug evaluation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satish ChoudhuryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, MIG 08, Housing Board Colony, Athgarh, Cuttack, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 754029, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-867X
Saubhagya Kumar JenaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Subarna MitraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Biswa Mohan PadhyDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sudipta MohakudDepartment of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical management of adenomyosis is an emerging perspective in modern gynecology. Though levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) effectively relieve symptoms in adenomyosis, neither has been approved for the same indication. Our study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these progestins in treating adenomyosis. Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS Design: Open-labeled, parallel, single-centered, randomized clinical trial. Methods: Patients with adenomyosis-associated pain with or without abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly allocated to either LNG-IUS group or DNG group. The primary outcome was a reduction in painful symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL), improvement in quality of life (QoL), and adverse drug reactions were also analyzed. Results: The VAS score significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. The baseline and post-treatment VAS scores in the LNG-IUS group were 6.41 ± 1.07 and 3.41 ± 1.04 ( Conclusion: DNG can be an effective and safe alternative to LNG-IUS for the medical management of adenomyosis. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at the clinical trial registry - India (CTRI) vide CTRI number CTRI/2020/05/025186.

Indexed as

adenomyosisdienogestlevonorgestrel intrauterine systemquality of liferandomized study

Identifiers

PMID38283750
PMCPMC10812097
OpenAlexW4391233483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.