ArticleRadiology case reports2024
Rare presentation of a rare disease: Bilateral congenital lobar overinflation.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital lobar overinflation is a rare but well-recognized congenital cause of neonatal and infantile respiratory distress. At times, the condition can mimic other congenital or acquired diseases and have atypical distribution and imaging patterns. Lobectomy of the involved lobe(s) is curative. We present our experience with 3 surgically confirmed cases of congenital lobar overinflation. Referral papers, patient's charts, including operation notes, and radiographic records were reviewed. All of them were initially misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed based on the initial radiographic examination alone. All 3 were referred to our center with respiratory distress, and the first 2 were treated with antibiotics prior to the settlement of their diagnosis. Chest computed tomography was key in diagnosing all 3 cases. The first patient was a 10-day-old neonate diagnosed with bilateral congenital lobar overinflation. The second patient was a 2-month-old infant diagnosed with right middle lobe disease. In these 2 cases, the initial assessment of the vascularity was atypically excessive in the affected lobe(s). Eventually, correlation with typical concurrent imaging features and the clinical condition of the patients led to the correct diagnosis. The third case was a 4-month-old infant with left upper lobe congenital lobar overinflation. All cases underwent successful surgical treatment. Congenital lobar overinflation is a rare anomaly, and multiple-lobe involvement is even rarer. Vascularity within the affected lobes is a subjective assessment that can be overestimated, leading to confusion, and a feature that needs correlation with other common imaging features and the clinical course of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.