ReviewBiomicrofluidics2024
Enabling biomedical technologies for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) biomarkers detection.
Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Candidate Regulatory Relationship and Expression Correlation Between miR-33a-5p and ANK3 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myelogenous/myeloid leukemia (CML) is a type of cancer of bone marrow that arises from hematopoietic stem cells and affects millions of people worldwide. Eighty-five percent of the CML cases are diagnosed during chronic phase, most of which are detected through routine tests. Leukocytes, micro-Ribonucleic Acids, and myeloid markers are the primary biomarkers for CML diagnosis and are mainly detected using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and genetic testing. Though multiple therapies have been developed to treat CML, early detection still plays a pivotal role in the overall patient survival rate. The current technologies used for CML diagnosis are costly and are confined to laboratory settings which impede their application in the point-of-care settings for early-stage detection of CML. This study provides detailed analysis and insights into the significance of CML, patient symptoms, biomarkers used for testing, and best possible detection techniques responsible for the enhancement in survival rates. A critical and detailed review is provided around potential microfluidic devices that can be adapted to detect the biomarkers associated with CML while enabling point-of-care testing for early diagnosis of CML to improve patient survival rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.