Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283702›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Efficacy of Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolisation in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Experience With Hybrid Angio-Computed Tomography and Glass Microspheres.

Abhiman Baloji, Naveen Kalra, Sreedhara Chaluvashetty, Harish Bhujade, Karamvir Chandel, Ajay Duseja, Sunil Taneja, Ujjwal Gorsi, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Abhiman BalojiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Naveen KalraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sreedhara ChaluvashettyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Harish BhujadeDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Karamvir ChandelDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil TanejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ujjwal GorsiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rajender KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Harmandeep SinghDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ashwani SoodDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Anish BhattacharyaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Baljinder SinghDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Bhagwant R MittalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Virendra SinghDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Manavjit S SandhuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) involves selective intra-arterial administration of microspheres loaded with a radioactive compound like Yttrium-90 (Y-90). Conventionally, C-arm-based cone-beam computed tomography has been extensively used during TARE. However, angio-computed tomography (CT) is a relatively new modality which combines the advantages of both fluoroscopy and fCT. There is scarce literature detailing the use of angio-CT in Y90 TARE. Methods: This was a retrospective study of primary liver cancer cases in which the TARE procedure was done from November 2017 to December 2021. Glass-based Y-90 microspheres were used in all these cases. All the cases were performed in the hybrid angio-CT suite. A single photon emission computed tomography-computed comography (SPECT-CT) done postplanning session determined the lung shunt fraction and confirmed the accurate targeting of the lesion. Postdrug delivery, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was obtained to confirm the distribution of the Y-90 particles. The technical success, median follow-up, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Results: A total of 56 hepatocellular carcinoma patients underwent TARE during this period, out of which 36 patients (30 males and 6 females) underwent Y90 TARE. The aetiology of cirrhosis included non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (11), hepatitis C (HCV) (11), hepatitis B (HBV) (9), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD) (2), alcoholic liver disease (ALD) (1), cryptogenic (1), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (1). The technical success was 100 % and the median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-32 months). The median OS was 15 months (range 10.73-19.27 months; 95 % CI) and the median local PFS was 4 months (range 3.03-4.97 months; 95 % CI). The ORR (best response, CR + PR) was 58 %. No major complications were seen in this study. Conclusion: TARE is a viable option for liver cancer in all stages, but more so in the advanced stages. The use of angio-CT in TARE aids in the precise delivery of the particles to the tumour and avoids non-target embolisation.

Indexed as

angio-CTglass microspheresHCCTAREYttrium-90

Identifiers

PMID38283702
PMCPMC10819781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.