ArticleSAGE open medicine2024
Prevalence and determinants of household medicine storage in Vietnam: A community-based cross-sectional study.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medicine Inventories and Practices of Self-Medication in Households of Medical and Pharmacy Students at the University of Rijeka, Croatia: A Cross-Sectional Study with Implications for Healthcare Professions Education.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Global Academic Research on Drug Take-Back Programs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Self-Medication as a Global Health Concern: Overview of Practices and Associated Factors-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prevalence and associated factors of antibiotic self-medication and home storage among antibiotic users: a cross-sectional study in Vietnam.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted individual health, potentially increasing the demand for home medicine storage. However, inappropriate household medicine storage can lead to drug waste and unnecessary hazards. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of and identify the factors that predict medicine storage in Vietnamese households. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted with 800 households in Danang, Vietnam. A multi-stage sampling method was applied in this study. The data collection tool was modified from previous studies and consisted of three sections: household head characteristics, household characteristics, and medicine storage practice. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors influencing medicine storage at a Results: Among 800 households surveyed, 71.6% stored medicine. Analgesics-antipyretics were the most common type of medicine stored (80.8%). 90.1% of households obtained their medicines from private pharmacies, 68.1% of households stored medicine for future use and 58.8% had a home medicine cabinet. 9.4% of households did not store medicine in the appropriate packaging and 19.4% of households did not check the expiry date of their medicine. Educational level (AOR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.84-4.06), income (AOR = 11.38; 95% CI = 1.46-88.79), presence of chronic illnesses (AOR = 12.44; 95% CI = 7.20-21.21), presence of children (AOR = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.56-3.58), presence of healthcare professionals (AOR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.28-3.56) were predictors of the medicine storage. Conclusions: The current study found a high prevalence of household medication storage and some inappropriate storage behaviors. Therefore, attention should be given to develop effective interventions and policies to promote safe and appropriate storage practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.