Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283607›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

Genome size variation and evolution during invasive range expansion in an introduced plant.

F Alice Cang, Shana R Welles, Jenny Wong, Maia Ziaee, Katrina M Dlugosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The spread of non-native species.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Nuclear DNA Content Analyses by Flow Cytometry of Saffron (Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chromosome-scale reference genome ofApplications in plant sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F Alice CangDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-1019
Shana R WellesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.
Jenny WongDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.
Maia ZiaeeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.
Katrina M DlugoschDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants demonstrate exceptional variation in genome size across species, and their genome sizes can also vary dramatically across individuals and populations within species. This aspect of genetic variation can have consequences for traits and fitness, but few studies attributed genome size differentiation to ecological and evolutionary processes. Biological invasions present particularly useful natural laboratories to infer selective agents that might drive genome size shifts across environments and population histories. Here, we test hypotheses for the evolutionary causes of genome size variation across 14 invading populations of yellow starthistle,

Indexed as

flow cytometryintraspecific genome size variationinvasive speciesyellow starthistle

Identifiers

PMID38283607
PMCPMC10810172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.