Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283599›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

Exploring coral speciation: Multiple sympatric

Zoe Meziere, Iva Popovic, Katharine Prata, Isobel Ryan, John Pandolfi, Cynthia Riginos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring coral speciation: Multiple sympatricEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zoe MeziereSchool of the Environment The University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-8523
Iva PopovicSchool of the Environment The University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-4236
Katharine PrataSchool of the Environment The University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6679-0066
Isobel RyanSchool of the Environment The University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5253-7591
John PandolfiSchool of the Environment The University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-6694
Cynthia RiginosSchool of the Environment The University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-4197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity originates and is maintained are fundamental challenge in evolutionary biology. Speciation is a continuous process and progression along this continuum depends on the interplay between evolutionary forces driving divergence and forces promoting genetic homogenisation. Coral reefs are broadly connected yet highly heterogeneous ecosystems, and divergence with gene flow at small spatial scales might therefore be common. Genomic studies are increasingly revealing the existence of closely related and sympatric taxa within taxonomic coral species, but the extent to which these taxa might still be exchanging genes and sharing environmental niches is unclear. In this study, we sampled extensively across diverse habitats at multiple reefs of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and comprehensively examined genome-wide diversity and divergence histories within and among taxa of the

Indexed as

conservationcoralsdemographic historygene flowpopulation genomicsspeciation continuum

Identifiers

PMID38283599
PMCPMC10818133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.