Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283553›Full record

ArticleKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2023

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate blood levels of interleukin-6 in lung cancer patients.

Seyed Vahid Jasemi, Soha Zia, Seyed Ghasem Mirbahari, Masoud Sadeghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seyed Vahid JasemiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Soha ZiaDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ghasem MirbahariJam Private Medical Laboratory, Kermanshah, Iran.
Masoud SadeghiMedical Biology Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The exact mechanism responsible for inflammation in malignancy is not completely understood, but it is possible that interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a major role in triggering and maintaining an inflammatory response. Aim: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the levels of IL-6 in the serum/plasma of lung cancer (LC) patients. Material and methods: The researchers searched four databases up to September 11, 2022, to find studies that reported on IL-6 levels in LC patients compared to healthy controls (HCs). They calculated effect sizes using standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). To evaluate the quality of each study, they used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). They performed subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, heterogeneity analyses, trial sequential analysis, and publication bias with the trim-and-fill method. Results: The meta-analysis included 28 studies, and the results showed that the pooled SMD was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.19; Conclusions: The study found that the publication year and quality score of the studies were positively associated with the level of IL-6, while the sample size was inversely related. The research suggests that measuring IL-6 levels in the blood could be useful for detecting and monitoring LC as it appears to be a reliable biomarker.

Indexed as

interleukin-6lung neoplasmmeta-analysisplasmaserum

Identifiers

PMID38283553
PMCPMC10809806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.