Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283515›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Prevalence of Middle Mesial Canals in the Second Mandibular Molars of an Iranian Subpopulation: A Cross-Sectional CBCT Study.

Maryam Kuzekanani, Mousa Azami Sardoei, Laurence J Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryam KuzekananiDepartment of Endodontics, Endodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Kerman, IRN.
Mousa Azami SardoeiDepartment of Endodontics, Endodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Kerman, IRN.
Laurence J WalshDentistry, School of Dentistry, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Missed additional canals are a common reason for the failure of root canal treatments. The prevalence of additional canals in molar teeth can vary because of ethnic differences. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and distribution of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in the second mandibular molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), for an adult population from Kerman in southeast Iran. Methodology De-identified retrospective provided CBCT scans from three private radiology centers in Kerman were reviewed (131 patients; 58 males (44.3%), 73 females (55.7%); age range: 13 to 54 years, mean age: 33). The presence of MMCs in mandibular second molars (222 teeth; 112 left and 110 right) was recorded, along with the morphology of the distal roots in the same teeth. Frequency data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Results The overall prevalence of MMC in the second mandibular molars was 2.3%. MMCs were found both unilaterally and bilaterally. More MMCs were found in females than males (2.7% vs. 1.7%), and on the left side (2.7% vs. 1.8%), but these differences were not statistically significant (p=1.0). There was no association between the existence of MMC in the mesial root and a second canal in the distal root of the same tooth. Conclusion Based on CBCT scans, the overall prevalence of MMC in mandibular second molars in this population was just below one in 44. Clinicians performing endodontic treatment on second molars should check for the presence of MMC so that this possible additional canal is not missed.

Indexed as

cbctiranianmiddle mesial canalprevalencesecond mandibular molars

Identifiers

PMID38283515
PMCPMC10817710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.