Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283466›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Properties and Shear Bond Strength of Conventional Orthodontic Adhesive Modified With Calotropis gigantea Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study.

Divya Ravuru, Ganugapanta Vivek Reddy, Arun Bhupathi, Karumuri Taraka Sunil Kumar, Gowri Sankar Singaraju, Prasad Mandava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From traditional uses to biochemical evidence: phytochemical diversity and bioactivities of Calotropis gigantea-a comprehensive update since 2013.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Divya RavuruOrthodontics, Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, IND.
Ganugapanta Vivek ReddyOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, IND.
Arun BhupathiOrthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, IND.
Karumuri Taraka Sunil KumarPharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Shri Vishnu College of Pharmacy, Bhimavaram, IND.
Gowri Sankar SingarajuOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, IND.
Prasad MandavaOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBonding of brackets with adhesives during orthodontic fixed appliance therapy is associated with white spot lesions (WSLs). An adhesive developed with an antimicrobial property is advantageous to prevent decalcification of the enamel surface. The current study assesses the antimicrobial and shear bond strength (SBS) characteristics of an experimental conventional orthodontic adhesive incorporated with different concentrations of nanoparticles (NPs) prepared from the leaves of MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 40 premolar teeth therapeutically extracted for orthodontic purposes were randomly assigned to four equal groups of n = 10 each. In control Group I, unmodified conventional adhesive was used to bond the brackets. In the three experimental groups, Group II, Group III, and Group IV, the brackets were bonded with modified conventional adhesive admixed with the STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A one-way ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test was used to analyze the difference in shear bond strength and microbial inhibition zone diameter between the groups with a probability (p) value of equal to or less than 0.05 as statistical significance.

resultsThe mean SBS for Group I without nanoparticles is 6.99±0.75 MPa. The SBS value decreased inversely in proportion to the concentration of NPs: Group II (1% NP) 6.29±0.67 MPa; Group III (5% NP) 4.40±0.47 MPa; and Group IV (10% NP) 1.98±0.21 MPa, which is statistically significant (p < 0.001). The incorporation of

conclusionIsolated

Indexed as

adhesiveantimicrobialbond strengthcalotropis giganteananoparticlesorthodontic

Identifiers

PMID38283466
PMCPMC10817711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.