Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283399›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2023

Treatment strategies for relapse after CAR T-cell therapy in B cell lymphoma.

Shuto Negishi, James H Girsch, Elizabeth L Siegler, Evandro D Bezerra, Kotaro Miyao, R Leo Sakemura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Emerging Roles of Fc Receptor-Like 1 in Immunotherapy of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Biocell : official journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopia Electronica ... et. al · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuto Negishi *Department of Hematology and Oncology, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.
James H Girsch *T Cell Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Elizabeth L SieglerT Cell Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Evandro D BezerraDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Kotaro MiyaoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan.
R Leo SakemuraT Cell Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic · USAnjo Kosei Hospital · JPKonan Kosei Hospital · JPThe Ohio State University · USWinnMed · US

Funding

PhD Training Program in Virology and Gene TherapyT32AI132165 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROBERTO B. CATTANEO · 2018 to 2026
$1.3M
Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Prevents Resistance to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell TherapyK99CA273304 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SAKEMURA, REONA · 2022 to 2023
$342k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA273304NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI132165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy have shown high overall response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. CART19 cell therapy has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients who relapsed less than 12 months after initial therapy or who are refractory to first-line therapy. However, durable remission of CART19 cell therapy is still lacking, and 30%-60% of patients will eventually relapse after CART19 infusion. In general, the prognosis of patients who relapse after CART19 cell therapy is poor, and various strategies to treat this patient population have been investigated extensively. CART19 failures can be broadly categorized by the emergence of either CD19-positive or CD19-negative lymphoma cells. If CD19 expression is preserved on the lymphoma cells, a second infusion of CART19 cells or reactivation of previously infused CART19 cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be considered. When patients develop CD19-negative relapse, targeting different antigens (e.g., CD20 or CD22) with CAR T cells, investigational chemotherapies, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are potential treatment options. However, salvage therapies for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma after CART19 cell therapy have not been fully explored and are conducted based on clinicians' case-by-case decisions. In this review, we will focus on salvage therapies reported to date and discuss the management of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas after CART19 cell therapy.

Indexed as

B-cell lymphomaCAR T-cell therapyreal-world datarelapsed/refractorysalvage therapies

Identifiers

PMID38283399
PMCPMC10811220
OpenAlexW4390790081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.