Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283323›Full record

ReviewAJOG global reports2024

Asian-White disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meejin Park, Susitha Wanigaratne, Rohan D'Souza, Roxana Geoffrion, Sarah Williams, Giulia M Muraca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Obstetric trauma and its association with race and immigration: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: cross-sectional study in the USA.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meejin ParkFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Global Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Ms Park).
Susitha WanigaratneEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Wanigaratne).
Rohan D'SouzaFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs D'Souza and Muraca).
Roxana GeoffrionDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Geoffrion).
Sarah WilliamsDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT (Dr Williams).
Giulia M MuracaFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Drs D'Souza and Muraca).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveObstetrical anal sphincter injury describes a severe injury to the perineum and perianal muscles after birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injury occurs in approximately 4.4% of vaginal births in the United States; however, racial and ethnic inequities in the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury have been shown in several high-income countries. Specifically, an increased risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in individuals who identify as Asian vs those who identify as White has been documented among residents of the United States, Australia, Canada, Western Europe, and the Scandinavian countries. The high rates of obstetrical anal sphincter injury among the Asian diaspora in these countries are higher than obstetrical anal sphincter injury rates reported among Asian populations residing in Asia. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in high-income, non-Asian countries was conducted to further evaluate this relationship. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, EmCare, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to March 2023 for original research studies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies using keywords and controlled vocabulary terms related to race, ethnicity and obstetrical anal sphincter injury. All observational studies, including cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort were included. 2 reviewers followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology recommendations.

methodsMeta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) for dichotomous data using the random effects model and the odds ratios as effect measures with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analysis was performed among Asian subgroups. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. Meta-regression was used to determine sources of between-study heterogeneity. Results: A total of 27 studies conducted in 7 countries met the inclusion criteria encompassing 2,337,803 individuals. The pooled incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury was higher among Asian individuals than White individuals (pooled odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-1.80). Subgroup analyses showed that obstetrical anal sphincter injury rates were highest among South Asians and among population-based vs hospital-based studies. Meta-regression showed that moderate heterogeneity remained even after accounting for differences in studies by types of Asian subgroups included, study year, mode of delivery included, and study setting. Conclusion: Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is more frequent among Asian versus white birthing individuals in multiple high-income, non-Asian countries. Qualitative and quantitative research to elucidate underlying causal mechanisms responsible for this relationship are warranted.

Indexed as

Asian raceAsian-White disparitiesethnic disparitiesfourth-degree perineal lacerationsobstetrical anal sphincter injuryobstetrical traumaracial disparitiessevere perineal lacerationsthird-degree perineal lacerations

Identifiers

PMID38283323
PMCPMC10820309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.