Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38283322›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2024

Side effects from epidural analgesia in laboring women and risk of cesarean delivery.

Alessandro Ghidini, Kelly Vanasche, Alyssa Cacace, Marietta Cacace, Simona Fumagalli, Anna Locatelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07272018 (Incidence and Clinical Significance of Maternal Hypotension After Labor Epidural Analgesia and Its Effects on Fetal Well-Being), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07272018 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Incidence and Clinical Significance of Maternal Hypotension After Labor Epidural Analgesia and Its Effects on Fetal Well-Being

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe Chaim Sheba Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled480ConditionsMaternal Hypotension, Labor Epidural Analgesia, Fetal Heart Rate AbnormalitiesArmsEpidural Analgesia (Standard Clinical Care)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro GhidiniAntenatal Testing Center, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, VA (Dr Ghidini and Mses Vanasche, A Cacace and M Cacace).
Kelly VanascheAntenatal Testing Center, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, VA (Dr Ghidini and Mses Vanasche, A Cacace and M Cacace).
Alyssa CacaceAntenatal Testing Center, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, VA, USA (Alyssa Cacace).
Marietta CacaceAntenatal Testing Center, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, VA (Dr Ghidini and Mses Vanasche, A Cacace and M Cacace).
Simona FumagalliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy (Ms Fumagalli and Dr Locatelli).
Anna LocatelliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy (Ms Fumagalli and Dr Locatelli).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidural analgesia may cause maternal hypotension and changes in the fetal heart rate. The implications of such side effects on the course of labor and delivery are incompletely understood.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether the occurrence of maternal or fetal side effects associated with labor epidural analgesia increased the risk for cesarean delivery. STUDY

designThis was a cohort study of all women who underwent epidural analgesia during labor for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Excluded were cases of multiples, fetal death, noncephalic presentation, and gestational age at birth <37.0 weeks. Maternal vital signs and fetal heart rate tracings for the 1 hour before and 1 hour after epidural analgesia was administered were reviewed. The occurrence of maternal hypotension, defined as a continuous variable and dichotomized into a decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure to <90 mm Hg or a drop in systolic blood pressure by >20% below the last value before epidural analgesia was administered, was related to changes in the fetal heart rate category. The principal outcome was cesarean delivery rate; binary logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounders, and mediation model analysis was used to quantify the extent to which significant variables participated in the causation pathway to cesarean delivery (SPSS version 28 was used for the analyses).

resultsA total of 439 women met the study criteria. Significant adverse reactions owing to epidural occurred in 184 of 439 women (41.9%) and included severe maternal hypotension in 159 of 439 participants (36.2%) and worsening fetal heart rate category in 50 of 439 participants (11.4%). The logistic regression analysis revealed that cervical dilation at epidural (

conclusionWorsening fetal heart rate category related to labor epidural independently increased the risk for cesarean delivery.

Indexed as

cesarean deliveryepidural analgesiafetal heart ratehypotensionlaborobstetric analgesia

Identifiers

PMID38283322
PMCPMC10820310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.