ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
Analytical assessment and validation of the ProteinSimple ELLA serum B-cell maturation antigen assay.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Soluble B-Cell Maturation Antigen (sBCMA) is a degradation product of plasma cell-bound BCMA found in serum. Serum sBCMA concentrations correlate with bone marrow plasma cellularity, making it an attractive biomarker for monitoring plasma cell disorders, such as multiple myeloma. Here we evaluated the automated BCMA immunoassay for the ProteinSimple ELLA, for the analysis of sBCMA. Design & methods: Inter and intra-run precision was assessed through replicate sBCMA measurements at 3 different concentration levels. Linearity was determined through serial dilution of a high sBMCA patient sample. Accuracy was assessed through split specimen analysis on two separate lots of reagents. Stability was assessed at 3 temperature levels over 14 days. Cross-reactivity was assessed on BCMA targeting and non-targeting chemotherapeutics. A reference range was established through the analysis of 146 healthy donor samples. The effect of endogenous interferents was assessed through spiking and recovery studies. Results: Inter and intra-run precision studies afforded CVs of <10% at all three concentration levels. Analytical measurement range was confirmed from 0.1 to 7 ng/mL. Accuracy studies afforded a slope of 0.976, intercept of 1.22, R Conclusions: The ProteinSimple ELLA sBCMA assay shows acceptable performance for the clinical assessment of sBCMA. The assay was highly affected by BCMA targeting therapeutics, thereby patients undergoing this therapy should not have their sBCMA levels assessed by this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.