ArticleIndian dermatology online journal
Prescription Practices Regarding the use of Systemic Drugs in the Management of Patients with Chronic Pruritus amongst Indian Dermatologists - A Questionnaire Based Survey.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic pruritus poses a significant challenge to treating physicians due to multitude of underlying causes and varying treatment strategies. Several topical, systemic, and physical modalities have been tried with variable success. Prescription practices in chronic pruritus are influenced by differential knowledge and experience of physicians, patient-related factors, and resource availability. Aim: The purpose of this survey was to observe the current pattern of practice in Indian dermatologists in the management of chronic pruritus and to identify practice gaps particularly regarding the use of various systemic agents as antipruritics. Materials and Methods: A previously validated questionnaire was sent to consultant dermatologists across India between January 2020 and July 2020. The questionnaire was comprised of six questions (multiple-choice questions as well as open-ended questions) regarding the use of antidepressants, cyclic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogues, opioid antagonists, antihistamines, and alternate therapies in the management of chronic pruritus. Results: A total of 700 dermatologists completed the questionnaire (response rate 70%). Overall, antihistamines were the most common drug prescribed in chronic pruritus (more than 95% respondents). Other systemic agents such as opioid antagonists, gabapentinoids, and antidepressants were prescribed by 22.42%, 71.85%, and 75.29% respondents, respectively, in chronic pruritus as either monotherapy or in combination with antihistamines in specific types of itches. Among antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (69.29%) were prescribed most often, followed by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (32.29%) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (9.14%). Other treatment options such as omalizumab, thalidomide, ondansetron, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and rifampicin were used by 10% respondents to alleviate pruritus in special situations. Conclusion: This survey revealed the redundant practice of prescribing antihistamines in chronic pruritus irrespective of etiology among Indian dermatologists. It also revealed a differential approach regarding use of systemic agents such as gabapentinoids, opioid antagonists, and antidepressants, in academic and non-academic institutions. The survey emphasized a barrier in writing prescription of systemic agents such as opioid antagonist and SNRIs due to lack of knowledge and experience, fear of side effects, and inadequate available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.