ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2024
Joint Imputation of General Data.
Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- A Real-World Comparison Between Adjuvant Docetaxel with Cyclophosphamide (TC) and Anthracycline-Taxane Chemotherapy in Early HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
High-dimensional complex survey data of general structures (e.g., containing continuous, binary, categorical, and ordinal variables), such as the US Department of Defense's Health-Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS), often confound procedures designed to impute any missing survey data. Imputation by fully conditional specification (FCS) is often considered the state of the art for such datasets due to its generality and flexibility. However, FCS procedures contain a theoretical flaw that is exposed by HRBS data-HRBS imputations created with FCS are shown to diverge across iterations of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Imputation by joint modeling lacks this flaw; however, current joint modeling procedures are neither general nor flexible enough to handle HRBS data. As such, we introduce an algorithm that efficiently and flexibly applies multiple imputation by joint modeling in data of general structures. This procedure draws imputations from a latent joint multivariate normal model that underpins the generally structured data and models the latent data via a sequence of conditional linear models, the predictors of which can be specified by the user. We perform rigorous evaluations of HRBS imputations created with the new algorithm and show that they are convergent and of high quality. Lastly, simulations verify that the proposed method performs well compared to existing algorithms including FCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.