Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282960›Full record

ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2024

Joint Imputation of General Data.

Michael W Robbins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael W RobbinsSenior Statistician with the RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-1733

Funding

Data Fusion for Predicting Long-term Program ImpactsR21AG058123 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI ROBBINS, MICHAEL · 2018 to 2019
$381k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional complex survey data of general structures (e.g., containing continuous, binary, categorical, and ordinal variables), such as the US Department of Defense's Health-Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS), often confound procedures designed to impute any missing survey data. Imputation by fully conditional specification (FCS) is often considered the state of the art for such datasets due to its generality and flexibility. However, FCS procedures contain a theoretical flaw that is exposed by HRBS data-HRBS imputations created with FCS are shown to diverge across iterations of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Imputation by joint modeling lacks this flaw; however, current joint modeling procedures are neither general nor flexible enough to handle HRBS data. As such, we introduce an algorithm that efficiently and flexibly applies multiple imputation by joint modeling in data of general structures. This procedure draws imputations from a latent joint multivariate normal model that underpins the generally structured data and models the latent data via a sequence of conditional linear models, the predictors of which can be specified by the user. We perform rigorous evaluations of HRBS imputations created with the new algorithm and show that they are convergent and of high quality. Lastly, simulations verify that the proposed method performs well compared to existing algorithms including FCS.

Indexed as

Fully conditional specificationJoint modelingMarkov Chain Monte CarloMissing dataMultiple imputation

Identifiers

PMID38282960
PMCPMC10810676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.