ArticleDNA2024
The Effects of Particle LET and Fluence on the Complexity and Frequency of Clustered DNA Damage.
Article in DNA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting DNA damage yields and assessing beam quality for protons and carbon ions using a DBSCAN algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rational Radionuclide Therapy for Recurrent Meningioma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Elevated SASP Factors, Reduced Antioxidant Enzymes, and Increased Tumor Susceptibility in Space Radiation-ExposedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- CpG Methylation Protects DNA against Ionizing Radiation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Hyperthermal Reactions in DNA Triggered by 1-20 eV Electrons: Absolute Cross Sections for Crosslinks, Strand Breaks, Clustered Damages and Base Modifications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Oxygen Effect on 0-30 eV Electron Damage to DNA Under Different Hydration Levels: Base and Clustered Lesions, Strand Breaks and Crosslinks.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Ultrahigh Dose Rate on Biomolecular Radiation Damage.Radiation research · 2024Article
- Article
- Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Human Body.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Clustered DNA-lesions are predominantly induced by ionizing radiation, particularly by high-LET particles, and considered as lethal damage. Quantification of this specific type of damage as a function of radiation parameters such as LET, dose rate, dose, and particle type can be informative for the prediction of biological outcome in radiobiological studies. This study investigated the induction and complexity of clustered DNA damage for three different types of particles at an LET range of 0.5-250 keV/μm. Methods: Nanometric volumes (36.0 nm Results: The total amount of DNA damage depends on particle type and LET. The number of ionization events underestimates the quantity of DNA damage at LETs higher than 10 keV/μm. Minimum LETs of 9.4 and 11.5 keV/μm are required to induce clustered damage by a single track of proton and alpha particles, respectively. For a given radiation dose, an increase in LET reduces the number of particle tracks, leading to more complex clustered DNA damage, but a smaller number of separated clustered damage sites. Conclusions: The dependency of the number and the complexity of clustered DNA damage on LET and fluence suggests that the quantification of this damage can be a useful method for the estimation of the biological effectiveness of radiation. These results also suggest that medium-LET particles are more appropriate for the treatment of bulk targets, whereas high-LET particles can be more effective for small targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.