ReviewMediterranean journal of rheumatology2023
Is there a Role for Anti-IL-5 Therapies in Eosinophilic Fasciitis?
Review in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Favorable clinical outcomes of biologic and targeted therapies in refractory eosinophilic fasciitis: a case-based systematic review.Rheumatology international · 2026Pooled it
- Characteristics and factors associated with treatment response among patients with eosinophilic fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced eosinophilic fasciitis: A pharmacovigilance and EADV Task force study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Observational
- Eosinophilic fasciitis.Medicina clinica · 2025Review
- Treatment and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Fasciitis.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eosinophilic Fasciitis (EF) is a rare disease, originally proposed as "diffuse fasciitis with eosinophilia" by Shulman in 1974. Symptoms of EF include peripheral eosinophilia accompanied by symmetrical inflammation of the subcutaneous fascia and muscle, usually locating in the upper arms or thighs. There is no approved standard of care treatment. Methods: Taking into account that eosinophils may be pathogenetically involved in EF, we performed a review on Medline focusing on anti-Interleukin-5 (IL-5) therapies in EF. Results: Only one case of a patient with EF has been reported who was successfully treated with reslizumab, an anti-IL-5 therapy. The patient had EF refractory to the commonly used immunosuppressive treatment but when reslizumab was added, the patient experienced remission of her symptoms. Discussion: The exact aetiology of EF is still unclear, and many therapeutic approaches have been tested. Commonly used immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids are not always effective and associate with significant side effects. Eosinophils seem to have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease; anti-eosinophilic therapies targeting IL-5/IL-5 Receptor could be an attractive alternative for the treatment of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.