ReviewAgronomy for sustainable development2024
The tricot approach: an agile framework for decentralized on-farm testing supported by citizen science. A retrospective.
Review in Agronomy for sustainable development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating on-farm genotypic performance and variability using ranking data.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Navigating Fusarium wilt of bananas: a ready-to-use subset of resistantFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- New crops on the block: effective strategies to broaden our food, fibre, and fuel repertoire in the face of increasingly volatile agricultural systems.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Q&A: Methods for estimating genetic gain in sub-Saharan Africa and achieving improved gains.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Examining gendered cassava trait preferences through commercial seed business: a case study of IITA GoSeed and Umudike Seeds in Nigeria.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Gender mainstreaming in sweetpotato breeding and dissemination in Ghana and Malawi.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Towards gender-transformative metrics in seed system performance measurement: insights for policy and practice in Sub-Sahara Africa.CABI agriculture and bioscience · 2024Review
- The tricot approach: an agile framework for decentralized on-farm testing supported by citizen science. A retrospective.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2024Review
- Gender-inclusive consumer studies improve cassava breeding in Nigeria.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Integrating Plant Physiology and Microbiome Engineering for Climate-Resilient Crops: Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Multi-Stress Tolerance.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
81 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Matching crop varieties to their target use context and user preferences is a challenge faced by many plant breeding programs serving smallholder agriculture. Numerous participatory approaches proposed by CGIAR and other research teams over the last four decades have attempted to capture farmers' priorities/preferences and crop variety field performance in representative growing environments through experimental trials with higher external validity. Yet none have overcome the challenges of scalability, data validity and reliability, and difficulties in capturing socio-economic and environmental heterogeneity. Building on the strengths of these attempts, we developed a new data-generation approach, called
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.