Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282888›Full record

ReviewPostepy dermatologii i alergologii2023

Differential diagnostics of food allergy as based on provocation tests and laboratory diagnostic assays.

Edyta Krzych-Fałta, Sławomir Białek, Adam J Sybilski, Aleksandra Tylewicz, Bolesław Samoliński, Oksana Wojas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edyta Krzych-FałtaDepartment of Basic Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Sławomir BiałekDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Adam J Sybilski2 Department of Paediatrics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra TylewiczDepartment of Pediatrics and Allergology, The National Institute of Medicine of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
Bolesław SamolińskiDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Oksana WojasDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the scale of the phenomenon, food allergy constitute a significant health problem and significantly impair the quality of life of patients. Differential diagnostics, including skin tests, sIgE detection tests, basophil and mast cell activation tests as well as double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge tests, is the gold standard in the diagnosis of food allergy. Recently, increasing attention has been paid to the potential use of nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of food allergy. Allergen dose, protocol standardization, assessment of subjective complaints and objectivization of test results are important factors determining the applicability of provocation tests.

Indexed as

double-blindfood allergylaboratory diagnosticsnasal provocation testplacebo-controlled

Identifiers

PMID38282888
PMCPMC10809836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.