Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282718›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Evaluation of the Puritan Bennett™ 980 Ventilator System Safety and Performance in the Real-World Setting.

Michael Roshon, Paras B Khandhar, Manoj Biniwale, Rangasamy Ramanathan, T Patrick Frazier, Feng Xu, Linlin Zhang, Xiangdong Guan, Dai Wenling, Bernard Lambermont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael RoshonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Penrose-St. Francis Health Services, Colorado, Springs, CO, USA.
Paras B KhandharPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beaumont Children's Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Manoj BiniwaleDivision of Neonatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6616-7132
Rangasamy RamanathanDivision of Neonatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
T Patrick FrazierDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Feng XuDepartment of Intensive Care, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Linlin ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiangdong GuanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dai WenlingDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yancheng First People's Hospital, Yancheng, People's Republic of China.
Bernard LambermontDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7915-8748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Mechanical ventilation is a life-supporting intervention but is associated with known risks and complications. To improve the efficacy and safety profile of mechanical ventilation, manufacturers have developed advanced ventilator settings, modes, and alarm strategies to optimize ventilation for patient needs while avoiding complications. However, there is little real-world data published on the deployment of ventilator technology. The main objective of this study was to assess the clinical safety and performance of the Puritan Bennett™ 980 Ventilator System (PB980) using real-world clinical data collected from a diverse, global patient population. Methods: This was a multi-center, post-market registry study that included nine sites: four in the United States of America, one in Europe, and four in China. Patients were enrolled into the registry if they were intended to be treated with a PB980. Data collection began at the start of ventilation and continued until extubation off the ventilator or up to seven days of ventilation, whichever occurred first. Subjects were divided by age into three categories: infants (0-365 days), pediatric (1-17 years), and adult (18 years and older). The primary outcome was device-related complication rate. Results: Two-hundred-and-eleven subjects were enrolled (41 infants, 48 pediatric, and 122 adults). Sixteen deaths, unrelated to device deficiency, occurred during the data collection timeframe (relative frequency: 7.58, 95% CI: 4.40, 12.0). Only one device-related adverse event was reported (relative frequency: 0.47% 95% CI: 0.01%, 2.61%). Conclusion: Ventilation by the PB980 was delivered safely in this multi-center observational study, which included a diverse sample of patients with broad ventilatory needs.

Indexed as

complicationscritical carePB980respiratory distresssafetyventilation

Identifiers

PMID38282718
PMCPMC10821633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.