Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282662›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Circulating tumor DNA analysis predicts recurrence and avoids unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy in I-IV colorectal cancer.

Wenhua Fan, Zhiyuan Xia, Rongrong Chen, Dagui Lin, Fang Li, Yang Zheng, Jiongyong Luo, Yuanyuan Xiong, Pengli Yu, Wei Gao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wenhua FanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiyuan XiaDepartment of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Rongrong ChenGeneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Dagui LinDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Fang LiGeneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2803-3803
Yang ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Jiongyong LuoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yuanyuan XiongGeneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Pengli YuGeneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Wei GaoGeneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Yuhua GongGeneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Feiran ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.
Sen ZhangDepartment of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning 530021, China.
Liren LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a biomarker that can define the risk of recurrence after curative-intent surgery for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, beyond the predictive power of postoperative ctDNA detection, the efficacy and potential limitations of ctDNA detection urgently need to be fully elucidated in a large cohort of CRC. Objectives: To define potentially cured CRC patients through ctDNA monitoring following surgery. Design: A prospective, multicenter, observational study. Methods: We enrolled 309 patients with stages I-IV CRC who underwent definitive surgery. Tumor tissues were sequenced by a custom-designed next-generation sequencing panel to identify somatic mutations. Plasma was analyzed using a ctDNA-based molecular residual disease (MRD) assay which integrated tumor-genotype-informed and tumor-genotype-naïve ctDNA analysis. The turnaround time of the assay was 10-14 days. Results: Postoperative ctDNA was detected in 5.4%, 13.8%, 15%, and 30% of patients with stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively, and in 17.5% of all longitudinal samples. Patients with positive postsurgery MRD had a higher recurrence rate than those with negative postsurgery MRD [hazard ratio (HR), 13.17; p < 0.0001], producing a sensitivity of 64.6%, a specificity of 94.8%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.6%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.5%. Furthermore, patients with positive longitudinal MRD also had a significantly higher recurrence rate (HR, 14.44; p < 0.0001), with increased sensitivity (75.0%), specificity (94.9%), PPV (79.6%), and NPV (93.4%). Subgroup analyses revealed that adjuvant therapy did not confer superior survival for patients with undetectable or detectable MRD. In addition, MRD detection was less effective in identifying lung-only and peritoneal metastases. Conclusion: Postoperative ctDNA status is a strong predictor of recurrence independent of stage and microsatellite instability status. Longitudinal undetectable MRD could be used to define the potentially cured population in CRC patients undergoing curative-intent surgery.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapycirculating tumor DNAcolorectal cancercuremolecular residual disease

Identifiers

PMID38282662
PMCPMC10822076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.