Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282636›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research

A review of clinical trials registered in India from 2008 to 2022 to describe the first-in-human trials.

Sowparnika Treasa Sabu, Shravan Venkatraman, Jerin Jose Cherian, Saibal Das, Monika Pahuja, Tulsi Adhikari, Shoibal Mukherjee, Nabendu Sekhar Chatterjee, Nilima Arun Kshirsagar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sowparnika Treasa SabuDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Shravan VenkatramanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Jerin Jose CherianDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Saibal DasIndian Council of Medical Research-Centre for Ageing and Mental Health, Kolkata, India.
Monika PahujaDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Tulsi AdhikariIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Shoibal MukherjeeConsultant, Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Development, Gumkhal, Uttarakhand, India.
Nabendu Sekhar ChatterjeeDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Nilima Arun KshirsagarDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This analysis was conducted to review the number, and describe the characteristics of first-in-human (FIH) Phase 1 clinical trials registered in India from 2008 to 2022. Materials and Methods: The data were extracted from the Clinical Trials Registry - India database for all FIH Phase 1 clinical trials registered between 2008 and 2022. Early-phase trials that were not FIH trials (e.g., pharmacokinetic studies and drug-drug interaction studies) were excluded from the study. Results: A total of 1891 trials were retrieved and 220 were included in the analysis. Most of the investigational products were drugs (55%) followed by vaccines (38.2%). The most common therapeutic class of drugs was cancer chemotherapy (19.8%), followed by antimicrobial chemotherapy and endocrinology (18.2% each). The most common vaccine was the influenza vaccine (21.4%), followed by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (15.5%). The pharmaceutical industry was the predominant sponsor for most (91%) of the Phase 1 trials. Of the top five sites where most of the Phase 1 trials were conducted, three were private nonacademic centers (cumulatively 31%) and two were tertiary care medical colleges (cumulatively 9%). Conclusion: Phase 1 clinical trials seem to be conducted in India predominantly with industry sponsorship. There is a need to have an alternate ecosystem to take forward molecules that do not receive adequate attention from the industry and molecules that are of national health priority other than areas such as chemotherapy, antimicrobials, and endocrinology. The Indian Council of Medical Research is setting up Phase 1 clinical trial capacity for molecules that predominantly may arise from nonindustry channels.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials Registry – IndiaIndian Council of Medical Researchinvestigational new drugsPhase 1 clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID38282636
PMCPMC10810051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.