ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
Designing and validating a research questionnaire - Part 2.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Measuring Food Safety Culture: A Systematic Review of Questionnaire Dimensions and Validation Practices.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Pooled it
- How should vaccine hesitancy be measured in healthcare workers? A systematic review of the measurement properties of validated tools.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge and attitude toward intimate partner violence among couples: a baseline findings from cluster randomized controlled trial in rural Ethiopia.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- Patient-reported outcomes in masculinizing gender-affirming chest surgery: validation of the GENDER-Q Chest scales.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Exploring Healthcare Professionals' Approaches to Promoting Physical Activity and Reducing Sedentary Behaviour in Clinical Paediatric Populations in South Wales.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Questionnaires Used to Explore the Perspectives of Parents and Health Professionals on Young Children's Use of Technology: Systematic Review.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Review
- Integrating lifestyle and clinical data in prostate cancer: expert assessment of a questionnaire.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Challenges faced and lessons learnt while trying to review CHD care in India from parents' perspective.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- From Classroom to Cleanroom: Evaluating Industrial Field Visits as a Pedagogical Tool in Parenteral Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Quality Control Education.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developing a culturally relevant bereavement needs assessment tool (CANCOPE-PI) for caregivers of children with cancer in India: a participatory research approach.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Screens and Teens: A youth participatory action research approach to developing a survey to assess sexual health risks in the digital age.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Internal Consistency of Self-report Anxiety Measures for Autistic Adults Without Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Implementation of Quality Improvement Projects: A Practical Guide From the American Society of Breast Surgeons Patient Safety and Quality Committee.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Socio-Behavioural Determinants of Periodontal Disease Among Adults in the Northern West Bank: A Cross-Sectional Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Patient and Physician Perspectives on Pharmacotherapy in Parkinson's Disease Psychosis: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Veterinary Nurse Burnout Prevention Survey (VNBPS).Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Balancing altruism, risk and ethics: Vietnamese students' views on human challenge studies.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess environmental and lifestyle factors influencing infectious disease outcomes: application to SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals in Cuba.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Midwifery students' and teachers' perceptions and needs regarding Extended Reality (XR) in educational training and its potential role in anxiety-related learning contexts.European journal of midwifery · 2026Article
- Association Between Khat (Biomarker insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Validity and reliability refer to the accuracy and consistency of a research tool. In the previous article in this series, we examined the development of a research questionnaire. In this article, we discuss the methods of determining the validity and reliability of a research questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.